Liquid Cooling Flow-Path Control for Leak Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquid-cooling systems for computer systems lack compatible leak detection and flow-rate monitoring solutions, with commercially available sensors being too large or expensive for widespread adoption, and existing systems do not offer controllable, reconfigurable, or customizable fluid flow paths.

Innovation Solution

The development of a control system that includes sensors configured to emit simulated signals for detected leaks or flow rates, allowing electro-mechanical actuators to respond by decoupling couplers or closing valves, and the use of compatible communication protocols to integrate with existing systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If commercially available leak detectors and flow-rate sensors are used, then leak detection and flow monitoring functions are achieved, but the sensors are too large or expensive for widespread adoption in computer systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection capabilityVSAvoidsensor size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the monitoring function into distributed sensor nodes that can be placed at different locations in the liquid cooling system. Each sensor is a small, independent unit that communicates with the central controller, allowing comprehensive monitoring without requiring large centralized sensor components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical flow sensors with optical detection methods. The sensor system uses light-based detection to monitor flow rate and leak conditions, eliminating the need for large mechanical moving parts and enabling smaller, more compact sensor design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If traditional liquid-cooling systems are used, then cooling function is provided, but the systems lack automated leak detection and flow-rate monitoring capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem monitoring capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor liquid cooling parameters (flow rate, temperature, leak detection) and automatically adjust system operation. The controller receives sensor data and triggers appropriate responses such as activating alarms, shutting down pumps, or adjusting fan speeds to maintain optimal cooling while preventing damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed to perform multiple functions through integrated sensor nodes that can detect leaks, measure flow rate, and monitor temperature using the same basic hardware platform. This multi-functional approach reduces overall system complexity compared to using separate dedicated devices for each monitoring function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed fluid flow paths are used in cooling systems, then system stability is maintained, but the systems cannot be reconfigured or optimized for different cooling requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow path reconfigurabilityVSAvoidflow control mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamically controllable flow paths using electronically actuated valves and variable speed pumps that can be adjusted in real-time based on thermal loads and system conditions. This allows the liquid cooling system to adapt its flow distribution to match changing cooling requirements without requiring physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as pump speed, valve positions, and flow rates to optimize cooling performance for different workloads and configurations. These parameter adjustments are controlled automatically based on sensor feedback, enabling flexible adaptation without adding complex mechanical reconfiguration mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11714432B2Flow-path controllers and related systems
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 COOLIT SYSTEMS INC
  • US11714432B2 patent drawing
  • US11714432B2 patent drawing
  • US11714432B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An observed operational state can include an operational state of one or more system devices. A sensor can emit, in response to a detected observable condition reflective of a given operational state, a simulated signal reflective of a different operational state as a proxy for the detected condition. A controller receiving such a proxy signal can, at least partially responsively to the proxy signal, issue a command corresponding to the given operational state. An electro-mechanical actuator can be selectively activatable responsive to the command.