Rolling Mill Cooling Section with Variable-Speed Pump Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cooling systems in rolling mills face inefficiencies due to pressure shocks, slow switching times, flow losses, and high energy consumption, particularly with on-off and control valves, which hinder precise temperature control and lead to increased wear and maintenance needs.

Innovation Solution

A cooling system utilizing variable-speed pumps controlled by a frequency converter, eliminating the need for valves and enabling rapid and precise adjustment of coolant flow, with optional shutoff devices and return lines to manage flow rates, and incorporating check valves to prevent pump dry-running.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If control valves are used to adjust coolant flow, then flow quantity can be continuously adjusted, but switching time is slow and pressure shocks occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow adjustment capabilityVSAvoidswitching time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes valves entirely from the coolant supply system and extracts only the necessary function of flow control, which is achieved by independently controlling multiple pumps to deliver precise flow quantities without requiring any valve components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamically controllable pumps with variable speed drives that can rapidly adjust their rotation speeds to change coolant flow quantities instantly, eliminating the slow mechanical adjustment of traditional control valves and achieving switching times under 0.2 seconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If on-off valves are used to control coolant flow, then flow can be switched, but switching time exceeds 1 second and pressure shocks occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow switching capabilityVSAvoidswitching time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates on-off valves from the system and extracts only the essential function of flow on/off control, achieving this by simply stopping or starting the respective pumps, which eliminates mechanical valve components and reduces switching time to under 0.2 seconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical valve opening/closing mechanism with an electrical control system that directly actuates the pumps, substituting mechanical motion with electrical control signals to achieve faster and shock-free flow switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If control flaps are used to adjust coolant flow, then flow can be controlled with simple structure, but cavitation occurs at pressure differences above 1 bar

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve structure simplicityVSAvoidcontrol durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes control flaps and all valve components from the system, extracting only the necessary flow control function which is achieved by independently controlling multiple pumps, thereby eliminating cavitation-prone mechanical components entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses hydraulic pumps with variable speed drives to control coolant flow, replacing the pneumatic/control flap mechanism with a hydraulic system that can handle high pressure differences without cavitation by directly controlling pump output rather than restricting flow through orifices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Measurement precision

If ball valves are used to control coolant flow, then hysteresis is eliminated, but valve cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control accuracyVSAvoidvalve cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates ball valves and all valve components from the system, extracting only the necessary flow control function through independent pump control, thereby achieving precise flow adjustment without the high cost of ball valves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive mechanical ball valves with an electrical control system using variable speed pump drives, substituting mechanical flow restriction with electrical control of pump output, achieving the same precision at lower cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Adaptability or versatility

If valves are used to adjust coolant flow, then flow control is achieved, but flow losses and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes valves from the system and extracts only the necessary flow control function, achieving it by adjusting pump output directly rather than restricting flow through valves, thereby eliminating the energy losses associated with valve pressure drops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operating parameters of the pumps (rotation speed, flow rate, pressure) to match the actual cooling requirements in real-time, avoiding the energy waste of maintaining high pressure and then restricting flow through valves, and delivering coolant at the optimal pressure and flow rate needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for rapid adjustment of coolant flow, reducing switching times to under 0.2 seconds, improving accuracy to 0.1%, minimizing energy consumption, and extending pump service life, while reducing maintenance and operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

A cooling system utilizing variable-speed pumps controlled by a frequency converter, eliminating the need for valves and enabling rapid and precise adjustment of coolant flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency conversion:

Implementation Method 2

a respective pump (10) assigned to each supply line (8), wherein the pump (10) delivers an actual flow (F) of the liquid coolant (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPumping: Pump

Implementation Method 3

the actual flow (F) of the liquid coolant (7) applied to the hot-rolled product (1) by means of the application device (6)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS11167332B2Cooling section with coolant flows which can be adjusted using pumps
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 PRIMETALS TECH GERMANY GMBH
  • US11167332B2 patent drawing
  • US11167332B2 patent drawing
  • US11167332B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooling section arranged within, upstream of, or downstream of a rolling train is provided. A hot-rolled product made of metal is cooled by the cooling section. Application devices of the cooling section are supplied with an actual current of a water-based liquid coolant via a supply line and a pump. The actual current of the coolant is applied to the hot-rolled product by means of the application device. The hot-rolled product is transported within the cooling section in a horizontal transport direction during the application of the coolant. A controller of the cooling section dynamically ascertains a target actuation state for each pump on the basis of a target current of the coolant to be applied onto the hot-rolled product by the application device and controls the pump in a corresponding manner such that the actual current delivered by each pump approximates the target current as much as possible.