Low energy sweeper method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cooling tower systems face inefficiencies due to turbulence introduced by eductors and centrifugal separators, leading to increased operational costs and power requirements for particulate matter removal.

Innovation Solution

The use of sweeper headers with drilled holes for gentle water flow and centrifugal separators with air bleeds and curved velocity plates reduces turbulence, allowing for effective particulate removal with lower system pressure and energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If eductors are used to amplify fluid discharge for sweeping particulate matter, then the cleaning coverage is improved, but system pressure requirements and power consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning coverageVSAvoidsystem pressure requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the eductor component from the system. Instead of using eductors to amplify fluid discharge, the invention uses a centrifugal separator that directly discharges fluid through a diffuser section, removing the need for pressure-intensive amplification devices while maintaining cleaning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical eductor-based amplification system with a centrifugal separation system that uses rotational force and a diffuser section to achieve fluid discharge. This substitution eliminates the need for high-pressure requirements associated with eductors while maintaining or improving cleaning performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If conventional vortex-based centrifugal separators are used to separate particulate matter, then separation function is achieved, but turbulence is introduced that decreases cleaning effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation functionVSAvoidturbulence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a diffuser section with a curved, expanding geometry that gradually directs fluid flow. This curved design reduces turbulence by smoothly transitioning flow directions, eliminating the harmful vibrations and turbulence generated by conventional vortex-based separators while maintaining effective particulate separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the rotational kinetic energy that would otherwise create harmful turbulence into a beneficial centrifugal separation mechanism. The curved diffuser section harnesses the rotational flow to enhance particulate separation while minimizing turbulence, transforming what would be a harmful effect into a useful separation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If the number of eductors or output volume is increased to improve cleaning effectiveness, then cleaning performance is enhanced, but power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidpower requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves sufficient cleaning effectiveness with a single centrifugal separator operating at moderate power levels, eliminating the need for multiple eductors or excessive fluid output. The diffuser section ensures efficient use of the discharged fluid, maintaining cleaning performance without requiring increased power input or multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in significant energy savings without compromising cleaning effectiveness, as the system pressure requirement is reduced and turbulence is minimized, enhancing the efficiency of the filtration process.

Implementation Method 1

Conventional centrifugal separators (such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,335,313, incorporated herein by reference) utilize centrifugal force and gravity to achieve varying degrees of separation of particulate from particulate/fluid mixtures.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

Some conventional separators employ a vortex system where the particulate/fluid mixture is introduced into a cylindrical chamber at a tangential angle generating centrifugal action in the mixture.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 3

The separated particulates generally settle to the bottom of the centrifugal separator in a sediment chamber from which they are periodically removed.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9702642B2Low energy sweeper method
Publication Date: 2017.07.11 GENERAL WATER SYSTEMS LLC
  • US9702642B2 patent drawing
  • US9702642B2 patent drawing
  • US9702642B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for cleaning debris from a floor of a cooling tower collection basin can include expelling a fluid from a first side of the basin floor to a second and opposite side of the basin floor where the fluid and debris are removed. The fluid may be expelled through radial openings in sweeper headers and may be removed through openings in a suction manifold. The method may further include removing the debris from the fluid.