Ultrafiltration System for Cooling Tower Microbiological Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for microbiological control in cooling systems require high biocide consumption and chemical treatments to achieve effective removal of nutrients, bacteria, and suspended solids, which can lead to environmental concerns and operational inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an ultrafiltration system with membranes of 5 µm or less pore size to separate and remove fine particles, bacteria, and nutrients from recirculating fluids, combined with the use of oxidizing and non-oxidizing biocides, and a regeneration method by backflushing the system when permeate flow drops below 15% of the initial flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high biocide consumption and chemical treatments are used, then effective removal of nutrients, bacteria, and suspended solids is achieved, but environmental concerns and operational inefficiencies increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobiological control effectivenessVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the microbiological control process into multiple independent modules: ultrafiltration membranes for physical separation of bacteria and suspended solids, adsorption media for nutrient removal, and targeted biocide application. This segmentation allows each module to perform its specific function efficiently, reducing the need for high biocide consumption while maintaining effective microbiological control and minimizing environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If oxidizing biocides are used, then non-selective oxidation of organic material and micro-organisms occurs, but resistance does not develop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobiological control effectivenessVSAvoidnon-selective oxidation of organic material
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies oxidizing biocides at controlled, partial doses rather than continuous high doses. The ultrafiltration system removes bacteria and suspended solids physically, so biocides only need to handle remaining organic material and micro-organisms. This partial action approach maintains microbiological control effectiveness while reducing non-selective oxidation of organic material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If non-oxidizing biocides are used, then selective attack on micro-organisms occurs, but higher concentrations are required and resistance can develop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobiological control effectivenessVSAvoidbiocide concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple control mechanisms: ultrafiltration for physical removal of bacteria and suspended solids, adsorption for nutrient removal, and low-concentration biocide application. This combination allows non-oxidizing biocides to work at lower concentrations alongside the physical and chemical treatment processes, reducing the quantity of biocide required while maintaining selective attack on micro-organisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If fine filtration with small pore size is used, then colloidal particles, bacteria, and macromolecules are separated, but membrane fouling and pressure differential increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle separation efficiencyVSAvoidpressure differential across membrane
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by removing suspended solids and larger particles through coarser filtration stages before the water reaches the ultrafiltration membranes. This pre-treatment prevents rapid fouling of the fine filtration membranes, maintaining particle separation efficiency while reducing pressure differential and extending membrane life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Reliability

If continuous biocide application is used, then microbiological control is maintained, but biocide consumption and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobiological control continuityVSAvoidbiocide consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The ultrafiltration system provides self-service by continuously removing bacteria, suspended solids, and organic material physically through membrane filtration. This self-cleaning action reduces the need for continuous biocide application, as the physical removal process maintains microbiological control while significantly reducing biocide consumption and environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces biocide consumption, enhances bacteria removal efficiency, and maintains low differential pressure, effectively controlling biological growth and fouling in cooling systems while minimizing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

Particle separation can be performed based on size exclusion. Large size particles are easily removed by sand filtration. However, only filters with small pore size, such as membranes or certain granular media, can separate colloidal particles, bacteria, macromolecules, small molecules, or even ions.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSize exclusion: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

Ultrafiltration (pore size 0.01-0.1 μm) is used to retain particles of a size of a few nanometres whereas microfiltration, which employs porous membranes with pore diameters between 0.05-10 μm is able to separate particles in the μm size range.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrafiltration: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 3

Oxidising Biocides: Oxidising biocides are generally non-selective, they can oxidise all organic material including micro-organisms. They oxidise the cell components of organisms, the thinner the cell wall the more vulnerable in organisms is towards oxidising biocides.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentEP2276705B1Environmentally friendly hybrid microbiological control technologies for cooling towers
Publication Date: 2017.05.31 NALCO CO

AI summary

This is a method that is an environmentally friendly hybrid microbiological control compromising a physical method through fine filtration, which removes nutrients, bacteria and suspended solids from open recirculating cooling systems. The method for microbiological control in cooling systems wherein a recirculating fluid containing an oxidising or a non-oxidising biocide or a mixture of an oxidising and a non-oxidising biocide and is passed through a fine filtration system rsulting in reduced microbiological matter, suspended solids and nutrients.