Cooperative Distributed Scheduling for D2D Communication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, device-to-device (D2D) communication often experiences resource collisions as multiple UE devices randomly select resources, leading to inefficiencies as the number of devices increases, particularly in contention-based modes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a Cooperative Distributed Scheduling (CDS) technique, where UE devices transmit a preferred transmission indicator (PTI) based on conditions like buffer size and Quality of Service (QoS), causing other devices to delay or refrain from transmitting scheduling assignments (SA) to minimize resource collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If UE devices randomly select resources from an allocated pool for D2D communication, then resource allocation is simple and decentralized, but resource collisions increase as the number of UE devices increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation simplicityVSAvoidcollision-free communication
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by having UE devices transmit preferred transmission indicators before actual resource selection. This allows devices to declare their transmission intentions in advance, enabling other devices to adjust their resource selection to avoid collisions before they occur, rather than dealing with collisions after random selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where UE devices monitor preferred transmission indicators from other devices and adjust their own resource selection accordingly. This feedback loop allows devices to learn about resource preferences of others and modify their behavior to minimize collisions while maintaining decentralized operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If UE devices transmit preferred transmission indicators and delay scheduling assignments based on received indicators, then resource collisions are reduced, but transmission delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision-free communicationVSAvoidtransmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by having UE devices delay transmission only when necessary - specifically when they receive preferred transmission indicators from other devices. Devices can choose to delay based on the number and priority of received indicators, allowing them to minimize delays while still avoiding collisions in critical cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of transmission timing dynamically based on received preferred transmission indicators. Instead of fixed random selection or uniform delay, devices adjust their transmission timing parameters adaptively - delaying by different amounts based on buffer size, indicator priority, and network conditions to balance collision avoidance with delay minimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12127229B2Cooperative distributed scheduling for device-to-device (D2D) communication
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 KYOCERA CORP
  • US12127229B2 patent drawing
  • US12127229B2 patent drawing
  • US12127229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a communication system having a plurality of user equipment (UE) devices that are operating in a contention based mode for device-to-device (D2D) communication, each UE device transmits a preferred transmission indicator when a condition for preferred transmission is met at the UE device. If a UE device receives a preferred transmission indicator, the UE device delays transmission of a D2D scheduling assignment (SA) to contend for communication resources for D2D communication. The length of the delay can be based on a number of preferred transmission indicators that are received. The preferred transmission indicator is based on a buffer size in one example.