Cooperative Framework for Clinical Trial Model Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The extraction and manipulation of clinical trial data from databases are resource-intensive and inefficient, particularly when evaluating multiple models for predicting disease progression, as existing competitive frameworks require exponentially increasing computing resources with the number of models evaluated.

Innovation Solution

A cooperative framework with competitive elements is implemented, using linear combinations of models and gradient descent techniques to evaluate the coefficients of individual models, reducing resource usage to a linear rate and enabling the identification of model combinations that predict disease progression effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional competitive frameworks are used to evaluate multiple models for predicting disease progression, then model evaluation accuracy can be maintained, but computing resource requirements increase exponentially with the number of models evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel evaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomputing resource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple competing models into a single ensemble model that integrates their predictions. Instead of evaluating each model separately through multiple clinical trials, the ensemble model aggregates predictions from individual models (e.g., using weighted averages or voting mechanisms), allowing simultaneous evaluation of multiple models while reducing computational overhead to linear scaling with the number of models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ensemble modeling framework serves multiple functions: it evaluates multiple individual models concurrently, produces a consolidated prediction, and reduces computational resource requirements. This multi-functional approach allows the system to maintain measurement precision across multiple models while using a single unified evaluation process rather than separate competitive frameworks for each model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If multiple models are evaluated using traditional competitive frameworks, then comprehensive model assessment is achieved, but the number of clinical trials required increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel assessment comprehensivenessVSAvoidnumber of clinical trials required
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple models are merged into an ensemble structure that can be evaluated through a single clinical trial or fewer trials. The ensemble model integrates predictions from multiple individual models, allowing comprehensive assessment of all models simultaneously rather than requiring separate trials for each model, thus reducing the total number of trials needed from exponential to linear or constant scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The framework performs preliminary integration of multiple models into an ensemble structure before conducting clinical trials. By pre-combining models with appropriate weighting or aggregation rules, the system prepares a unified evaluation framework that assesses multiple models concurrently during the trial, avoiding the need to conduct separate trials for each model afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If individual models are evaluated separately, then model-specific performance can be analyzed, but overall resource consumption and evaluation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel-specific performance analysisVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The ensemble model merges individual model evaluations into a unified framework where each model's performance can still be analyzed separately through its contribution to the ensemble prediction. The system maintains the ability to assess individual model performance (e.g., through feature importance, weight analysis, or component-wise evaluation) while conducting all evaluations simultaneously within a single trial, reducing total evaluation time from sequential to parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10923234B2Analysis and verification of models derived from clinical trials data extracted from a database
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 BARHAK JACOB
  • US10923234B2 patent drawing
  • US10923234B2 patent drawing
  • US10923234B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes frameworks and techniques directed to the analysis and verification of models extracted from a database. In some cases, the database can include an online database, such as clinicaltrials.gov administered by the United States National Institutes of Health. In particular, this disclosure describes implementations that utilize models derived from clinical trial data extracted from a database and analyzes the models. The analysis of the models can be used to verify the results of the clinical trials from which the models were derived. Additionally, the analysis of the models can identify a combination of models that can be used to predict health outcomes of one or more biological conditions for one or more populations.