Cooperative Maneuvering System for Connected Vehicle Congestion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for managing cooperative maneuvering among connected vehicles lack effective methods to prevent congestion and traffic instability during complex maneuvers like lane changes and merges, as existing standards do not adequately address the number of vehicles involved and specific maneuver details.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine the appropriate maneuver for an ego vehicle based on traffic information, select cooperative vehicles, simulate the maneuver's impact on congestion, and adjust the number of vehicles involved to prevent congestion, using processors and sensors to communicate and coordinate with other vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If more cooperative vehicles are selected to perform coordinated maneuvers, then the maneuver efficiency and traffic flow improvement increase, but the risk of triggering congestion and traffic instability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuver efficiencyVSAvoidcongestion risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs simulation of the cooperative maneuver before actual execution to predict potential congestion and traffic instability. This preliminary action allows the system to identify problematic scenarios and adjust the maneuver plan accordingly, preventing harmful effects before they occur in the actual traffic flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simulation results as feedback to iteratively adjust the maneuver parameters and cooperative vehicle selection. The simulation provides information about potential congestion and instability, which is fed back into the decision-making process to optimize the maneuver plan and avoid triggering harmful traffic effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the number of cooperative vehicles involved in the maneuver is increased, then the maneuver can be performed more smoothly, but the complexity of coordinating and managing these vehicles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuver smoothnessVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a centralized coordination mechanism that acts as an intermediary to manage the cooperative maneuver. This mediator collects information from all cooperative vehicles, performs simulation-based optimization, and distributes coordinated instructions, thereby managing the complexity of multi-vehicle coordination without requiring direct peer-to-peer communication between all vehicles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If detailed simulation and adjustment processes are implemented to prevent congestion, then traffic stability is improved, but the computation time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic stabilityVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs simulation and adjustment processes selectively based on the maneuver context and traffic conditions. Rather than always performing full simulations, the system applies simulation and adjustment only when necessary to prevent congestion, thereby reducing overall computation time while maintaining traffic stability when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12080170B2Systems and methods for managing cooperative maneuvering among connected vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 TOYOTA MOTOR ENG & MFG NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US12080170B2 patent drawing
  • US12080170B2 patent drawing
  • US12080170B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a cooperative maneuver for an ego vehicle is provided. The method includes determining a maneuver of the ego vehicle based on traffic information in a target lane, selecting one or more cooperative vehicles to be involved in the maneuver, determining whether the maneuver of the ego vehicle and actions of the one or more cooperative vehicles trigger congestion in the target lane based on simulation of the maneuver and the actions, instructing the ego vehicle to perform the maneuver in response to determining that the maneuver of the ego vehicle and actions of the one or more cooperative vehicles do not trigger congestion, and adjusting a number of cooperative vehicles to be involved in the maneuver in response to determining that the maneuver of the ego vehicle and actions of the one or more cooperative vehicles trigger congestion.