Coordinate Measuring Strategy for Faster High-Quality Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring objects with coordinate measuring devices are inefficient, requiring long measurement durations, high computing effort, and large data storage capacity, which increases process time and costs.

Innovation Solution

A method to dynamically adjust the measurement strategy by changing measurement quality-relevant parameters, such as reducing the number of measurement points or increasing relative movement speed, when the measurement quality exceeds a predetermined minimum, to reduce measurement time, computing effort, and data storage requirements while maintaining target quality standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a large number of measurement points are acquired to improve measurement quality, then measurement quality is improved, but measurement duration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement qualityVSAvoidmeasurement duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the measurement strategy adaptive rather than static. The system dynamically adjusts measurement parameters (number of measurement points, scanning speed) based on real-time assessment of actual measurement quality versus target quality, enabling the measurement process to optimize itself during execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes measurement parameters (number of measurement points, scanning speed) based on the assessed measurement quality. When quality exceeds the target, parameters are adjusted to reduce measurement points and increase speed, thereby resolving the contradiction between measurement quality and measurement duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If a large number of measurement points are acquired to improve measurement quality, then measurement quality is improved, but computational effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement qualityVSAvoidcomputational effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of number of measurement points based on quality assessment. When measurement quality exceeds the target, the system reduces the number of measurement points, thereby reducing computational effort while maintaining sufficient quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously assessing measurement quality during the measurement process and using this information to adjust the measurement strategy. The feedback loop enables the system to reduce computational effort when quality targets are already met

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If a large number of measurement points are acquired to improve measurement quality, then measurement quality is improved, but data storage capacity required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement qualityVSAvoiddata storage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts the parameter of number of measurement points based on quality assessment. When quality exceeds the target, fewer measurement points are taken, directly reducing the data storage capacity required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If the speed of relative movement between object and sensor is reduced to improve measurement quality, then measurement quality is improved, but measurement duration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement qualityVSAvoidmeasurement duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the scanning speed parameter based on quality assessment. When measurement quality exceeds the target quality, the system increases the scanning speed, thereby reducing measurement duration while maintaining sufficient quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts scanning speed during the measurement process based on real-time quality assessment, enabling adaptive optimization of the trade-off between measurement quality and measurement duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3901563B1Method and device for determining a measuring strategy for measuring a measurement object and program
Publication Date: 2022.12.14 CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIKE GMBH
  • EP3901563B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3901563B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and a device for determining a measurement strategy for measuring a measurement object (2) by a coordinate measuring device (1), wherein the measurement object (2) is measured according to a measurement strategy and a measurement quality of the measurement is determined, wherein the measurement strategy is changed if the measurement quality is higher than a predetermined minimum target measurement quality, wherein the measurement strategy is changed in such a way that the time required for measuring the measurement object (2) according to the changed measurement strategy and/or the computational effort required for measuring the measurement object (2) according to the changed measurement strategy and/or the data storage capacity required for measuring the measurement object (2) according to the changed measurement strategy is reduced, wherein the changed measurement strategy is determined as the new measurement strategy, and a program.