Coordinated Access Point Positioning for Indoor Accuracy and Low Overhead

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing location estimation techniques in wireless communication systems face challenges in achieving high accuracy, particularly in indoor environments, due to limited precision and the need for manual input of network information, which can be laborious and prone to human error, and resource-intensive measurement processes, especially in crowded conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method for automated position estimation that involves coordinating multiple access points (APs) using various measurement techniques such as ToF, AoA, and RTT, determining weights for each measurement, and iteratively refining location estimates based on channel conditions and feedback to improve accuracy and reduce resource consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual input of network information is used for location estimation, then the process is simple to implement, but it is laborious and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidaccuracy of location estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated position estimation using access points and measurement techniques (ToF, AoA, RTT) without requiring manual input of network information. The access points autonomously collect measurements and compute locations, eliminating human error while maintaining ease of deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical input processes with automated electronic measurement and computation systems. Access points automatically perform signal measurements and the system computationally determines locations, substituting human-operated mechanical processes with automated electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If traditional location estimation techniques are used, then the implementation is straightforward, but the precision is limited and cannot achieve decimeter or centimeter levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of implementationVSAvoidlocation estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple measurement techniques (Time of Flight, Angle of Arrival, Round Trip Time) from multiple access points into a unified location estimation system. This merging of multiple measurement sources enables high-precision decimeter or centimeter-level accuracy while maintaining automated straightforward implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-dimension measurement approaches to multi-dimensional measurement by incorporating multiple access points and multiple measurement types (ToF, AoA, RTT) simultaneously, enabling precision breakthrough to decimeter or centimeter levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive measurements are performed to improve location accuracy, then the precision increases, but resource consumption increases especially in crowded conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation estimation accuracyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs measurements selectively rather than continuously, using triggers based on confidence levels and channel conditions. When confidence is sufficient or conditions are unfavorable, measurements are reduced or skipped, maintaining accuracy while conserving resources in crowded conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where location estimates and confidence levels inform subsequent measurement decisions. High confidence estimates reduce the need for additional measurements, creating a feedback loop that maintains precision while optimizing resource consumption dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of manufacture

If automated position estimation is implemented without coordination, then deployment is easier, but accuracy and reliability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of deploymentVSAvoidlocation estimation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal coordination protocol that enables access points to autonomously perform multiple functions (measurement, computation, collaboration) without specialized configuration. This multi-functionality maintains ease of deployment while ensuring reliable coordinated operation for accurate location estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances location estimation accuracy to decimeter or centimeter levels, reducing resource usage and eliminating the need for manual input, thereby expanding the applicability to indoor scenarios and improving usability in industries like manufacturing and healthcare.

Implementation Method 1

using various measurement techniques such as ToF, AoA, and RTT

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS20260032633A1Automated position estimation based on coordinating access points
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20260032633A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032633A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032633A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer-readable media for identifying a locations of a network entities within a network. A method for identifying a location of an (AP) includes receiving a first location measurement associated with a first measurement variant and a second location measurement associated with a second measurement variant from a first AP; receiving a third location measurement associated with the first measurement variant and a fourth location measurement associated with the second measurement variant from a second AP; determining weights associated with the location measurements; determining a first location associated with the first AP and a second location associated with the second AP based on a first weight, a second weight, a third weight, and a fourth weight; determining a confidence of the first location based on a comparison of the first location measurement and the second location measurement.