Coordinated Immunotherapy Regimen for Tumor Eradication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cancer immunotherapy approaches are often complex, require multiple therapeutic agents, and yield inconsistent results across different cancer types, with existing immune stimulants and checkpoint inhibitors failing to consistently eradicate tumors due to immune evasion mechanisms employed by cancer cells.

Innovation Solution

A coordinated cancer immunotherapy method involving a cancer vaccine regimen combined with concurrent immune stimulation and checkpoint inhibition, with a Th1 bias, using specific cytokines and antibodies like IL-2, IL-12, IL-15, ALT-803, anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-CTLA4, to enhance the immune response against tumor-specific antigens and neoepitopes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple therapeutic agents and complex treatment regimens are used to overcome immune evasion mechanisms, then the immune response against tumor antigens is enhanced, but the treatment complexity and duration increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidtreatment regimen complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple immunotherapeutic agents (checkpoint inhibitors, immune stimulants, and tumor-specific vaccines) into a coordinated treatment regimen. This merging of therapies addresses multiple immune evasion mechanisms simultaneously, achieving reliable tumor regression while managing complexity through structured scheduling of the combined therapies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If multiple therapeutic agents are administered to address immune evasion, then tumor regression is improved, but the treatment duration and number of administrations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor eradicationVSAvoidtreatment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a timed treatment sequence where checkpoint inhibition and immune stimulation are administered before vaccine administration. This preliminary action primes the immune system in advance, creating a more responsive state that accelerates the subsequent vaccine-induced immune response, thereby reducing overall treatment duration while maintaining efficacy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If existing immune stimulants and checkpoint inhibitors are used alone, then some immune response is generated, but consistent tumor eradiction is not achieved due to immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor eradiction consistencyVSAvoidresponse across different cancer types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates different local immune environments through sequential therapy: checkpoint inhibitors remove suppression at the system level, immune stimulants create activation at the cellular level, and tumor-specific vaccines generate targeted response at the antigen level. This multi-level approach achieves consistent tumor eradiction across different cancer types by addressing immune suppression at multiple levels simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11564980B2Tumor treatment method with an individualized peptide vaccine
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 NANTCELL INC
  • US11564980B2 patent drawing
  • US11564980B2 patent drawing
  • US11564980B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Cancer is treated via a coordinated treatment regimen that use various compounds and compositions that employ a combination vaccination together with immune modulatory treatment and biasing of an immune response towards a Th1 profile.