Coordinated Work Machine Control for Low-Latency Synchronized Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current work equipment control systems require separate and discrete methods for tracking, tasking, and monitoring multiple work machines, leading to latency and inefficiencies in coordinated operations.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system with a user input system that provides simultaneous signals to multiple work machines' control systems, allowing them to operate in a coordinated mode, reducing latency through synchronized actuation of actuators across machines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If separate and discrete control systems are used for each work machine, then each machine can be controlled independently, but latency and inefficiencies occur in coordinated operations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndependent control capabilityVSAvoidLatency in coordinated operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges separate control systems into a unified coordinated control system that simultaneously manages multiple work machines. The system integrates control signals for multiple machines through a centralized architecture, enabling synchronized operation and eliminating the latency associated with discrete independent control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed with multi-functionality to handle both independent machine control and coordinated operations. It can operate in multiple modes: independent control mode for individual machine operations and coordinated control mode for synchronized multi-machine operations, providing universal control capability across different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If separate control systems are used for each work machine, then system complexity is reduced for individual machines, but efficiency in coordinated tasks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndividual machine control system complexityVSAvoidEfficiency in coordinated tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The coordinated control system is segmented into modular components that can independently manage individual machines while coordinating their operations. Each work machine maintains its own control module, but these modules are integrated through a centralized coordination layer that enables efficient multi-machine tasks without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary coordination layer is introduced between individual machine control systems and the central control unit. This intermediary manages the communication and coordination between machines, enabling efficient coordinated tasks while preserving the relative simplicity of individual machine control architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If discrete systems are used for tracking and monitoring multiple work machines, then implementation is simpler for each system, but operational precision in coordinated mode deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveImplementation simplicityVSAvoidOperational precision in coordinated mode
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The coordinated control system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor the position, status, and operation of multiple work machines. This feedback is processed by the centralized control system to make real-time adjustments, ensuring high operational precision in coordinated mode while maintaining implementation simplicity through standardized feedback protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Speed

If separate control methods are used for each work machine, then system initialization is faster, but latency in coordinated operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSystem initialization speedVSAvoidLatency between machine motions
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary configuration and synchronization of control parameters during the initialization phase. Multiple work machines are pre-configured with coordinated control settings and communication protocols before operation begins, enabling faster response times and reduced latency during actual coordinated operations without sacrificing initialization speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11746500B2Coordinated motion system and method
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 OSHKOSH CORPORATION
  • US11746500B2 patent drawing
  • US11746500B2 patent drawing
  • US11746500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle system includes a first work machine including a first actuator and a first control system, a second work machine including a second actuator and a second control system, and a user input system including a transceiver and a user interface. The user input system is configured to receive a user input via the user interface and provide a signal to both the first control system and the second control system. The first control system and the second control system are configured to receive the signal and thereafter operate the first actuator of the first work machine and the second actuator of the second machine in a coordinated mode of operation. The user input system is configured to provide, and the first control system and the second control system are configured to receive, the signal simultaneously thereby reducing latency between motion of the first work machine and the second work machine in the coordinated mode of operation.