COPD Risk Assessment via Active and Rest Activity Ratios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients only assess physical activity during active periods, neglecting the impact of symptoms during rest periods, which can lead to inaccurate risk assessment and increased hospitalizations.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and system that measure and compare physical activity data during both active and rest periods, using ratios or differences in activity levels to assess the risk of exacerbation and hospitalization, with a risk assessment unit determining if the activity data meets predetermined criteria related to activity levels, and optionally generating an alarm for increased risk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If physical activity is only monitored during active periods, then the monitoring system is simpler and easier to operate, but the risk assessment accuracy deteriorates because rest period symptoms are neglected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring period is segmented into active periods and rest periods, with separate activity thresholds applied to each segment. This allows comprehensive assessment without requiring continuous complex monitoring, as each segment can be evaluated independently with appropriate simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors activity continuously but only triggers alerts when activity falls below thresholds during rest periods or below thresholds during active periods. This partial action approach focuses computational resources on critical assessment moments rather than continuous complex analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If activity thresholds are set to detect all potential exacerbations, then the detection sensitivity improves, but the number of false alarms increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexacerbation detection reliabilityVSAvoidfalse alarm frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different activity thresholds are applied to different time periods: a first threshold for active periods and a second, higher threshold for rest periods. This local differentiation allows sensitive detection during rest when even minor activity drops are concerning, while being less sensitive during active periods when lower activity is normal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the expected activity level based on the time of day and patient's normal patterns. During rest periods, the system expects low activity and triggers alerts only for abnormal drops, while during active periods it allows for more variability, reducing false alarms while maintaining detection sensitivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10849566B2Apparatus, system, method and computer program for assessing the risk of an exacerbation and/or hospitalization
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US10849566B2 patent drawing
  • US10849566B2 patent drawing
  • US10849566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an apparatus, a system (100), a method (200), and a computer program for assessing the risk of an exacerbation and/or hospitalization. A patient's physical activity is measured (e.g., by an accelerometer (110)) during an active period of time (e.g., during awake hours) and during a rest period of time (e.g., during sleep hours) to gather first and second activity data. A risk of exacerbation and/or hospitalization is assessed (e.g., by a risk assessment unit (120)) based on an expression involving the respective activity data during active and rest periods fulfilling a predetermined relationship with respect to a predetermined activity level. For instance, low activity data during active periods and high activity data during rest periods indicates an increased risk of exacerbation and/or hospital readmission for the patient.