Coplanar Card Edge Connector for Mixed PCB Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing card edge connectors have limited tolerance for thickness variances between circuit boards, restricting their ability to connect boards of varying thicknesses in a coplanar manner due to dimensional limitations and terminal flexibility.

Innovation Solution

The electrical connector design features a frame with parallel platforms and a housing that includes conductive terminals, allowing for screws to be inserted through threaded holes to securely connect circuit boards of different thicknesses in an edge-to-edge configuration, with ribs providing shielding and improved terminal density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional card edge connector design is used, then the structure is simple, but the tolerance for thickness variations between circuit boards is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance for thickness variationsVSAvoidconnector structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connector is divided into multiple functional components: a frame with first and second platforms for mounting different circuit boards, a housing containing conductive terminals, and ribs for shielding. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, enabling the connector to accommodate thickness variations while maintaining structural integrity and electrical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connector design transitions from a single-plane mounting structure to a three-dimensional configuration with platforms at different heights and a housing that extends in multiple directions. This dimensional change allows the connector to accommodate circuit boards of different thicknesses by providing mounting surfaces at varying elevations while maintaining coplanar alignment of the connected boards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional separation space is provided between circuit boards, then thickness variance tolerance is improved, but the overall device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickness variance toleranceVSAvoidconnector size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The housing containing the conductive terminals is nested within the frame structure, and the ribs are integrated into the frame and housing. This nesting arrangement allows multiple functional elements to occupy overlapping or adjacent spaces efficiently, providing the necessary separation for thickness tolerance without proportionally increasing the overall connector volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of increasing separation distance in the primary mounting direction, the design utilizes vertical dimension with platforms at different heights and three-dimensional positioning of terminals within the housing. This allows thickness variance accommodation through vertical offset rather than horizontal separation, maintaining compact overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If terminal density is increased, then electrical connection efficiency is improved, but signal interference between terminals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical connection efficiencyVSAvoidsignal interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Ribs are strategically positioned between adjacent conductive terminals within the housing to provide localized electromagnetic shielding. This local quality enhancement allows high terminal density for improved connection efficiency while the ribs create electromagnetic barriers that prevent signal interference between neighboring terminals, addressing both requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If shielding structures are added between terminals, then signal integrity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal integrityVSAvoidshielding structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shielding ribs are merged with the frame and housing structures rather than being separate components. The ribs extend from the frame into the housing, forming an integrated shielding system that provides signal integrity protection while avoiding the complexity of separate shielding assemblies. This merging reduces the number of discrete parts and simplifies manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11929575B2Coplanar card edge connector
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 AMPHENOL COMML PROD (CHENGDU) CO LTD
  • US11929575B2 patent drawing
  • US11929575B2 patent drawing
  • US11929575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrical connector that connects circuit boards in a coplanar manner. The electrical connector includes a frame comprising a plate, and two platforms extending above the plate and substantially parallel to each other. A housing of the electrical connector holding conductive elements is coupled to the plate of the frame such that a top surface of the housing is substantially flush with top surfaces of the two platforms. The platforms of the frame have threaded holes extending therethrough such that screws can be inserted to hold one of the two platforms of the electrical connector to a first circuit board and the other one of the two platforms of the electrical connector to a second circuit board that is substantially edge aligned to the first circuit board. Such a configuration enables connecting circuit boards of various thicknesses in a coplanar manner.