Mode Suppression Structures Placement in Coplanar Waveguides

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for placing mode suppression structures (MSS) in coplanar waveguides for quantum devices lack consistency across design, simulation, and prototype phases, leading to inefficiencies in mitigating cross-talk and resonance issues, which are critical for achieving optimal performance in quantum devices.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a processor and memory that determines optimal locations for MSS on a quantum chip, simulates performance, generates a placement model, and uses an auto-bonder to precisely install MSS at specific coordinates, ensuring consistent placement across design, simulation, and fabrication phases with minimal noise and deviation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual placement methods are used for mode suppression structures, then flexibility in adjustment is maintained, but placement consistency and precision deteriorate across design, simulation, and fabrication phases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMSS placement precisionVSAvoidplacement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes placement rules and constraints during the design phase that pre-determine MSS locations. These rules are then automatically applied in fabrication, eliminating the need for manual repositioning and ensuring consistency across all phases. The assessment component evaluates potential locations based on pre-defined criteria before final placement decisions are made.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automated assessment and simulation components that independently evaluate and determine optimal MSS placements without requiring manual intervention. The placement rules automatically guide the fabrication process, allowing the system to self-correct and self-optimize placements based on simulated performance feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple physical prototypes are built iteratively, then performance optimization is achieved, but development time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum chip performanceVSAvoidprototype development time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual simulation model that replicates the physical quantum chip's electromagnetic behavior. This digital twin allows performance evaluation, cross-talk analysis, and resonance frequency assessment to be conducted in silico before any physical fabrication occurs, eliminating the need for iterative physical prototyping while maintaining optimization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Performance simulation and assessment are conducted in advance during the design phase, allowing optimization decisions to be made before fabrication. The system predicts cross-talk and resonance issues virtually and adjusts MSS placements accordingly, so that the first physical prototype built already incorporates optimized placements, avoiding iterative rework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If mode suppression structures are placed without coordinated assessment, then placement speed is maintained, but cross-talk and resonance mitigation effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMSS placement efficiencyVSAvoidcross-talk and resonance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates simulation feedback that evaluates the impact of MSS placements on cross-talk and resonance frequencies. The assessment component analyzes simulated performance data and adjusts placement decisions accordingly, creating a closed-loop optimization process that ensures effective cross-talk mitigation while maintaining efficient automated placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual trial-and-error placement methods with an automated computational system that uses electromagnetic simulation and assessment algorithms. This substitution enables rapid evaluation of multiple placement scenarios and automatic selection of optimal configurations that effectively suppress cross-talk and resonance, achieving both efficiency and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11126776B2Coherent placement of slotline mode suppression structures in coplanar waveguides for quantum devices
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11126776B2 patent drawing
  • US11126776B2 patent drawing
  • US11126776B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a memory that stores computer executable components, and a processor executes the computer executable components stored in the memory. The computer executable components comprise: an assessment component that determines locations for mode suppression structures on a coplanar waveguide of a quantum chip having qubits; a simulation component that simulates performance of the quantum chip based on a subset of the locations for the mode suppression structures and parameters of the quantum chip, and generates a mode suppression structures placement model. A template component generates a template of specific coordinates for placement of a subset of the mode suppression structures on the quantum chip based on the mode suppression structures placement model; and a driver component employs the template to drive an auto-bonder to install the subset of the mode suppression structures on the quantum chip at the specific coordinates.