Copper Alloy Composition for Strength and Conductivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high strength copper alloys, such as phosphor bronze and nickel silver, face issues with poor hot workability, high energy and production costs, low conductivity, and weight reduction challenges, while brass alloys suffer from poor stress relaxation characteristics, color fastness, and susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking.

Innovation Solution

A copper alloy with specific compositions of Zn, Ni, Sn, and optional elements like P, Al, Sb, As, and rare earth metals, optimized to achieve a metallographic structure with a high α phase ratio and controlled phase ratios of γ and β phases, enhancing strength, conductivity, and antimicrobial properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If plating (Ni or Sn) or transparent clear coating is applied to avoid color change, then color fastness is improved, but antimicrobial performance and conductivity are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor fastnessVSAvoidantimicrobial performance and conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the plating layer (Ni or Sn) and transparent clear coating from the copper alloy structure. By developing a copper alloy composition that inherently resists oxidation and color change through controlled alloying elements (Sn: 0.01-3.0 mass%, Ni: 0.01-5.0 mass%, and optional P, Al, Sb, As, Pb), the patent removes the need for external protective coatings while preserving antimicrobial performance and conductivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the copper alloy by precisely controlling the content ranges of Sn (0.01-3.0 mass%), Ni (0.01-5.0 mass%), and optional elements (P: 0.003-0.10 mass%, Al: 0.005-0.50 mass%, Sb: 0.01-0.10 mass%, As: 0.01-0.10 mass%, Pb: 0.0005-0.05 mass%). These parameter changes create an alloy that forms a protective oxide layer resistant to color change, eliminating the need for additional plating or coating layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If high strength copper alloys (phosphor bronze, nickel silver) are used, then strength is improved, but hot workability, conductivity, and production cost deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial strengthVSAvoidhot workability and production cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the compositional parameters by using Cu as the base metal with controlled additions of Sn (0.01-3.0 mass%) and Ni (0.01-5.0 mass%), rather than using Cu-Sn-P (phosphor bronze) or Cu-Zn-Ni (nickel silver) systems. This parameter optimization achieves tensile strength ≥400 MPa while maintaining excellent hot workability and conductivity (13-25% IACS), and reduces production costs compared to traditional high-strength alloys.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite alloy system combining Cu, Sn, Ni, and optional elements (P, Al, Sb, As, Pb) in optimized proportions. This composite material achieves superior的综合 performance: high strength (≥400 MPa tensile strength), excellent hot workability, good conductivity (13-25% IACS), and cost-effectiveness, outperforming conventional phosphor bronze and nickel silver alloys.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If brass (Cu-Zn alloy) is used, then cost performance is improved, but stress relaxation characteristics and color fastness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost performanceVSAvoidstress relaxation characteristics and color fastness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the compositional parameters by using Cu-Sn-Ni alloying instead of Cu-Zn (brass). By controlling Sn content at 0.01-3.0 mass% and Ni content at 0.01-5.0 mass%, the alloy achieves excellent stress relaxation characteristics and superior color fastness (resistance to oxidation-induced color change) while maintaining cost performance comparable to or better than traditional brass alloys.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Weight of moving object

If copper alloy is used for thin sheet applications, then size reduction is improved, but productivity and economical efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize and weight reductionVSAvoidproductivity and economical efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the compositional parameters (Sn: 0.01-3.0 mass%, Ni: 0.01-5.0 mass%, and optional elements) to achieve a material that combines high strength (≥400 MPa tensile strength) with excellent formability and weldability. This enables the production of thin-sheet components (reducing size and weight) while maintaining high productivity through improved manufacturing performance, including excellent hot workability and reduced production costs compared to traditional high-strength alloys.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3056578B1Copper alloy
Publication Date: 2018.10.31 MITSUBISHI SHINDOH CO LTD
  • EP3056578B1 patent drawing
  • EP3056578B1 patent drawing
  • EP3056578B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A copper alloy according to the present invention includes 17 mass% to 34 mass% of Zn, 0.02 mass% to 2.0 mass% of Sn, 1.5 mass% to 5 mass% of Ni, and a balance consisting of Cu and unavoidable impurities, in which relationships of 12≤f1=[Zn]+5×[Sn]-2×[Ni]≤30, 10≤[Zn]-0.3×[Sn]-2×[Ni]≤28, 10≤f3={f1×(32-f1)×[Ni]}1/2≤33, 1.2≤0.7×[Ni]+[Sn]≤4, and 1.4≤[Ni]/[Sn]≤90 are satisfied, conductivity is 13% IACS to 25% IACS, a ratio of an α phase is 99.5% or more by area ratio or an area ratio of a γ phase (γ)% and an area ratio of a β phase (β)% in an α phase matrix satisfy a relationship of 0≤2×(γ)+(β)≤0.7.