Copper Electroplating Bath Additives for Uniform Pillar Morphology

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current copper electroplating methods for photoresist defined features, such as copper pillars and redistribution layer wiring, face challenges in achieving uniform surface morphology, with improvements in one attribute often coming at the expense of another, leading to defects that compromise the performance of advanced packaging articles.

Innovation Solution

A copper electroplating method using a bath comprising reaction products of imidazole compounds, bisepoxides, and halobenzyl compounds, along with electrolytes, accelerators, and suppressors, to achieve copper photoresist features with an average % TIR of 5% to 10% and % WID of 8% to 10%, resulting in substantially uniform morphology and flat profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional copper electroplating methods are used, then copper features can be formed, but the surface morphology is non-uniform with defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface morphology uniformityVSAvoidfeature performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the electroplating bath chemistry by incorporating specific additives (polyethylene glycol, polypropylene oxide, and sulfur compounds) to change the deposition parameters. This results in uniform surface morphology with 5% to 10% TIR while maintaining feature uniformity through controlled electrochemical reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary substances (leveling agents and brighteners) into the electroplating bath to mediate the copper deposition process. These additives adsorb on the growing copper surface to control morphology and prevent defects, acting as intermediaries between the copper ions and the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If electroplating is optimized for one attribute, then that attribute improves, but other attributes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature uniformityVSAvoiddeposition rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves both high feature uniformity (5% to 10% TIR) and high deposition rates by optimizing multiple bath parameters simultaneously, including additive concentrations, temperature, and pH. This multi-parameter optimization enables simultaneous improvement of precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The electroplating bath uses a composite chemistry system combining multiple additives (polyethylene glycol, polypropylene oxide, sulfur compounds) working together to achieve both uniform feature formation and high deposition rates, leveraging synergistic effects of different chemical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If copper pillars are plated with high deposition rates, then productivity increases, but surface morphology uniformity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer throughputVSAvoidpillar surface flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs intermediary leveling agents that adsorb on high-points of the growing copper surface during rapid deposition, preventing excessive growth and maintaining surface flatness. These intermediaries enable high deposition rates while preserving morphology uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies deposition parameters through additive chemistry to maintain surface flatness during high-rate plating. The additives change the electrochemical reaction kinetics to favor uniform surface growth even at high current densities, enabling both high productivity and surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method provides copper photoresist features with a smooth, nodule-free surface, enabling reliable copper pillar structures and improved performance in advanced packaging applications by maintaining uniformity and flatness, thus enhancing the reliability and efficiency of copper electroplating processes.

Implementation Method 1

The substrate with the patterned photoresist is then immersed in a metal electroplating bath, typically a copper electroplating bath, and metal is electroplated in the circuit line pattern or aperture to form features such as pillars, bond pads or circuit lines

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroplating: Electroplating

Implementation Method 2

electroplating a plurality of copper photoresist defined features in the plurality of apertures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical deposition: Electrodeposition

Data Source

PatentUS10006136B2Method of electroplating photoresist defined features from copper electroplating baths containing reaction products of imidazole compounds, bisepoxides and halobenzyl compounds
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 DDP SPECIALTY ELECTRONICS MATERIALS US LLC
  • US10006136B2 patent drawing
  • US10006136B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Electroplating methods enable the plating of photoresist defined features which have substantially uniform morphology. The electroplating methods include copper electroplating baths with reaction products of imidazole compounds, bisepoxides and halobenzyl compounds to electroplate the photoresist defined features. Such features include pillars, bond pads and line space features.