Coral Aragonite Substrates for Stable Cartilage and Bone Repair

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for repairing damaged cartilage and bone tissue, such as osteoarthritis, are inadequate due to the lack of effective materials that can promote site-specific cell and tissue growth, and existing surgical techniques face challenges with immunological reactivity and limited tissue availability.

Innovation Solution

Optimized solid substrates made from coral or coral derivatives with specific fluid uptake capacity and contact angle characteristics, characterized by tapered sides and shapes like conical or pyramidal frustums, are used to promote cell and tissue growth, along with accompanying tools and methods for implantation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If natural polymer scaffolds (collagen, alginate, hyaluronic acid, chitosan) are used, then cell interaction and seeding are improved, but mechanical stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell interaction and seedingVSAvoidmechanical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses coral-based scaffolds which are natural calcium carbonate structures that provide both mechanical strength and porosity for cell growth. The coral matrix serves as a composite material combining structural integrity with biological functionality, resolving the contradiction between mechanical stability and cell interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The coral scaffolds are processed to create controlled porosity (60-90% pore volume) while maintaining structural strength. The porous structure enables cell infiltration and tissue growth while the coral matrix provides the necessary mechanical support, simultaneously achieving both cell seeding capability and mechanical stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Strength

If chemical modification is applied to natural materials to obtain mechanical strength, then mechanical stability is improved, but toxicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The coral scaffolds are designed as temporary, biodegradable structures that provide mechanical support during the tissue regeneration process and then naturally degrade without toxic byproducts. The calcium carbonate material breaks down into harmless components, eliminating long-term toxicity concerns while providing necessary short-term mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The coral scaffolds utilize the body's natural physiological processes for both structural support and degradation. The material self-digests through natural metabolic pathways, converting the scaffold into useful building blocks for new tissue formation without requiring external chemical interventions that could introduce toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If autologous tissue grafting is used, then biocompatibility is improved, but tissue availability and surgical complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebiocompatibilityVSAvoidsurgical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coral scaffolds are designed to mimic the natural extracellular matrix structure and composition, creating an artificial template that replicates the biological environment needed for tissue growth. This copying approach provides biocompatibility similar to autografts without requiring complex harvesting procedures from other body sites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Quantity of substance

If existing cartilage repair materials are used, then tissue replacement is achieved, but site-specific cell growth promotion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue replacementVSAvoidsite-specific cell growth promotion
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The coral scaffolds are engineered with spatially varying properties including gradient porosity, different pore sizes in different regions, and localized surface modifications. These local quality variations guide cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation to specific areas, enabling precise control over where and how tissue grows within the scaffold structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These substrates enhance tissue repair by facilitating cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, offering improved incorporation and reduced surgical complications, thereby addressing the limitations of existing cartilage and bone repair techniques.

Implementation Method 1

which when implanted in situ, is of sufficient strength and hardness and useful in stimulating bone and/or cartilage repair

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

the immediate microenvironment and the three-dimensional (3D) organization are important factors in differentiation in general and particularly in chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical support: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20240382652A1Optimized solid substrates, tools for use with same and uses thereof for promoting cell and tissue growth
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 CARTIHEAL 2009
  • US20240382652A1 patent drawing
  • US20240382652A1 patent drawing
  • US20240382652A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides optimized solid substrates for promoting cell or tissue growth or restored function, which solid substrate comprises aragonite and is characterized by a specific fluid uptake capacity value of at least 75%, or a contact angle value of less than 60 degrees when in contact with a fluid and which is further characterized by tapered sides and tools for implantation of optimized solid substrates.