Cord Guide Retention Assembly for Architectural Coverings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retractable coverings for architectural structures, such as windows and doors, face issues with cord retention due to unintentional decoupling of split-rings from the shade panel, leading to operational problems and safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

A cord retention assembly featuring a cord guide with a closed shape and retention members, such as spacers or elastic bands, to prevent unintentional decoupling by blocking rotation past the attachment location, ensuring the cord guide remains coupled to the shade panel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If split-rings are used as cord guides, then the cord guide structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the cord guide becomes unintentionally decoupled from the shade panel due to unintended rotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecord guide structureVSAvoidcord guide retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cord guide is divided into two functional parts: the cord guide body (which guides the cord) and the retention member (which prevents decoupling). This segmentation allows each part to perform its specific function optimally while maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retention member acts as an intermediary component between the cord guide body and the shade panel attachment point. It mediates the connection by preventing rotation past the attachment location, thereby securing the cord guide without complicating the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the cord guide allows free rotation, then the ease of operation is improved, but the cord guide becomes decoupled from the shade panel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecord guide rotationVSAvoidcord guide attachment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retention member is designed to preemptively prevent harmful rotation before decoupling can occur. By blocking rotation past the attachment location, it counteracts the tendency of the cord guide to unintentionally decouple while still allowing necessary operational movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The cord guide system transitions from a completely static connection to a dynamic one where controlled movement is permitted. The retention member allows rotation within safe limits while preventing excessive rotation that would cause decoupling, optimizing both operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the cord guide is secured rigidly to prevent rotation, then the reliability is improved, but the ease of operation and installation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecord guide attachmentVSAvoidcord guide installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retention member changes the rotational parameter of the cord guide from completely free to controlled. It allows rotation up to a certain point (attachment location) but prevents further rotation, thereby maintaining reliability while preserving ease of installation and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If no retention mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the lift cord can be pulled away and formed into large loops creating safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecord retention structureVSAvoidsafety hazard from cord loops
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful function (preventing cord loop formation) is extracted from the cord guide body and implemented through a separate retention member. This keeps the cord guide structure simple while adding the necessary safety function through a dedicated component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The retention member serves as an intermediary safety mechanism between the cord guide and the shade panel. It prevents the cord from being pulled away by blocking rotation that would allow large loop formation, thereby eliminating safety hazards without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10072459B2Cord retention assembly for a covering
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 HUNTER DOUGLAS INC
  • US10072459B2 patent drawing
  • US10072459B2 patent drawing
  • US10072459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, a cord retention assembly for a covering for an architectural structure may include a cord guide coupled to a shade panel of the covering that is configured to receive a corresponding cord of the covering. The cord guide may form a closed shape and may also be configured to define an entryway around at least a portion of a perimeter of the closed shape. In addition, the cord retention assembly may include at least one retention member installed relative to the cord guide such that the retention member(s) prevents the entryway of the cord guide from being rotated past the attachment location defined between the shade panel and the cord guide.