Loudspeaker Core Cap Offset Grooves Magnetic Flux

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing core cap design in loudspeakers with shell-pot design reduces the ability to carry magnetic flux due to increased magnetic reluctance caused by adhesive control grooves, leading to magnetic saturation and reduced flux density in the working air gap.

Innovation Solution

The improved core cap design features offset adhesive control grooves, reducing the cross-sectional reduction and effectively increasing the magnetic flux capacity by approximately 50% while maintaining assembly error-proofing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If adhesive control grooves are added to the core cap to prevent adhesive squeezing out, then assembly reliability is improved, but magnetic flux carrying capacity deteriorates due to increased reluctance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly reliabilityVSAvoidmagnetic flux carrying capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from having grooves on both faces of the core cap (two-dimensional distribution) to having grooves on only one face (one-dimensional distribution). This dimensional change reduces the total groove cross-sectional area, thereby reducing magnetic reluctance while preserving the adhesive control function through strategic positioning of grooves on a single face.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by strategically positioning adhesive control grooves on only one face of the core cap rather than uniformly distributing them on both faces. This localized approach concentrates the adhesive control function where it is most effective while minimizing the impact on magnetic flux capacity in other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If adhesive control grooves are positioned to prevent adhesive leakage, then manufacturing precision is improved, but magnetic flux density in the working air gap deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive control precisionVSAvoidmagnetic flux density
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the adhesive control function from both faces of the core cap and concentrates it on a single face. By taking out the groove configuration from the traditional two-face arrangement and relocating it to one face, the design maintains adhesive control precision while extracting the magnetic flux path disruption to a minimal extent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If core cap cross-section is reduced to accommodate grooves, then adhesive reservoir function is improved, but magnetic reluctance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive reservoir functionVSAvoidmagnetic circuit reluctance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by providing adhesive control grooves on only one face of the core cap rather than both faces. This partial implementation of the groove function is sufficient to achieve adhesive reservoir capability while avoiding the excessive reduction of cross-sectional area that would occur with grooves on both faces, thereby minimizing the increase in magnetic reluctance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The offset grooves enhance the magnetic flux density in the working air gap, reducing magnetic leakage and fringing, and maintaining the advantages of adhesive reservoir and assembly orientation error-proofing.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic circuit 102 that produces a stationary magnetic field of high flux density in a narrow, working air gap 104

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field generation: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

A force induced by the interaction between the current carried in the voice coil 106 and the magnetic flux in the air gap 104 actuates an assembly 108

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic interaction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the core cap 122 and shell-pot 118 each provide a path from the opposite poles of the permanent magnet 120 for carrying and directing the magnetic field into the air gap 104

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux conduction: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS7400740B2Core cap for loudspeaker
Publication Date: 2008.07.15 HARMAN INT IND INC
  • US7400740B2 patent drawing
  • US7400740B2 patent drawing
  • US7400740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A core cap or top plate for use with loudspeakers that includes offset adhesive control grooves on the opposite faces of the disk-like core cap is disclosed. The grooves are offset from one another by a distance that makes the smallest dimension between any feature of the grooves about the same as the nominal thickness of the core cap. The core cap increases the magnetic flux capacity over prior art core cap designs, while maintaining features advantageous to error-proof the orientation of the core cap in the loudspeaker.