Core Drill Controller Cooling Layout for Better Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing core drills face challenges in effectively cooling the controller, which can lead to overheating and affect performance and handling.

Innovation Solution

The core drill design includes a configuration where the controller is positioned between the motor and the grip part, with air-intake ports in the controller-housing part, allowing for effective cooling through airflow, and the grip part is aligned with the rotational axis to improve weight balance and handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the controller is positioned in the motor-housing part, then the structure is compact, but the controller overheats due to insufficient cooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller temperatureVSAvoidcontroller housing structure
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The housing is divided into separate motor-housing part and controller-housing part, allowing independent optimization of cooling for the controller while maintaining compact integration. The controller-housing part includes dedicated air-intake ports and exhaust ports that are separate from the motor housing, enabling targeted cooling airflow to the controller without interfering with motor cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A fan is introduced as an intermediary component to actively generate cooling airflow. The fan blows air through the air-intake ports, across the controller, and out through the exhaust ports, creating a controlled cooling path that effectively removes heat from the controller without requiring direct exposure or complex passive cooling structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Temperature

If air-cooling paths are added for the controller, then cooling effectiveness improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller temperatureVSAvoidcooling structure
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fan serves multiple functions: it cools the controller by blowing air through the controller-housing part, and also contributes to motor cooling by directing airflow toward the motor. The air-intake ports and exhaust ports are strategically positioned to serve both cooling needs simultaneously, reducing overall system complexity while achieving effective cooling for both components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling paths for the controller and motor are merged into a unified airflow system. The air-intake ports are positioned to allow air to flow across both the controller and motor, and the exhaust ports are arranged to discharge heat from both components, creating an integrated cooling solution rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If the grip part is aligned with the rotational axis, then weight balance and handling improve, but the structural design becomes more constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehandlingVSAvoidstructural design
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grip part is deliberately positioned asymmetrically relative to the motor housing, specifically aligned with the rotational axis rather than being centrally or evenly distributed. This asymmetric placement optimizes the weight distribution and center of gravity for better handling and control during operation, while the modular housing design accommodates this asymmetric arrangement without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively cools the controller, enhances handling by improving weight balance, and ensures easier operation of the core drill.

Implementation Method 1

at least a portion of the controller is disposed between the motor and the grip part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS12454016B2Core drill
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 MAKITA CORP
  • US12454016B2 patent drawing
  • US12454016B2 patent drawing
  • US12454016B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A core drill includes: a motor having a rotor, which is rotatable relative to a stator about a rotational axis extending in the front-rear direction; a speed-reducing mechanism, which is disposed more forward than the stator; an output shaft, at least a portion of which is disposed more forward than the speed-reducing mechanism and which, in the state in which a core bit is mounted thereon, is rotated by the rotational force of the rotor transmitted via the speed-reducing mechanism; a battery-mounting part, on which a battery pack is mounted; a motor-housing part, which houses the motor; a grip part, at least a portion of which is disposed along the extension of the rotational axis more rearward than the motor-housing part; and a controller, which controls the motor. In the front-rear direction, at least a portion of the controller is disposed between the motor and the grip part.