Core Network Reversion Based on Geographic Alert Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication networks face challenges in managing network failures or alarms effectively, particularly when a large number of alerts originate from a specific geographic area, leading to potential cascading failures without adequate automatic reversion to prior configurations.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that define geographic areas enclosing all core network nodes, determine the number of alerting nodes within these areas, and trigger automatic reversion or user prompting for reversion of core network nodes to prior configurations when the number of alerts exceeds a threshold, considering recent reconfigurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual monitoring and reversion of core network nodes is performed, then operational control and flexibility are maintained, but response time to cascading failures increases and operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting cascading failure patterns through geographic area analysis and proactively triggering reversion of core network nodes before complete network collapse occurs. The management entity continuously monitors alert patterns and pre-identifies nodes that require reversion, eliminating manual detection delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The network management system performs self-service by automatically detecting cascading failures through geographic alert analysis, determining which core network nodes need reversion, and executing the reversion process without human intervention. The system monitors its own health status and autonomously initiates corrective actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If geographic area monitoring with threshold-based automatic reversion is implemented, then response speed and automation improve, but system complexity and false alarm risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the network monitoring function by dividing the network into geographic areas and analyzing alerts within each segment independently. The management entity determines the geographic area of each core network node and counts alerts specific to each area, allowing localized automated responses without requiring complex global analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes by establishing threshold values for alert counts in geographic areas. When the number of alerts in a geographic area exceeds the threshold, the system automatically triggers reversion of core network nodes. This parameter-based approach simplifies automation logic while maintaining effective control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive monitoring of all core network nodes is performed, then detection accuracy improves, but computational load and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by focusing monitoring resources on geographic areas where cascading failures are detected rather than uniformly monitoring all network nodes. The management entity determines the geographic area of each alert and concentrates analysis on specific regions, reducing overall computational load while maintaining high detection accuracy for critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is segmented by geographic area, with each area independently analyzed for alert patterns. This segmentation allows the system to process alerts in smaller, manageable groups rather than analyzing all network nodes simultaneously, reducing computational complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260032042A1Network management
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 ELISA OYJ
  • US20260032042A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032042A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032042A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an example aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus comprising at least one processing core and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processing core, cause the apparatus at least to store plural definitions of geographic areas, each one of the geographic areas enclosing all core network nodes of a single network domain area, determine, for each of the geographic areas, a number of alerting nodes therein, and trigger reverting, or trigger prompting of a user whether to revert, of at least a subset of core network nodes of a first network domain area to prior configurations based on determining that a number of alerting nodes in a geographic area enclosing the core network nodes of the first network domain area exceeds a threshold number.