Core-Shell Silicon Anodes for Secondary Battery Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Silicon-based anodes in electrochemical cells face challenges due to large volume changes during cycling, leading to shortened cycle life and reduced capacity, and existing solutions are limited by high precursor costs and non-scalable processing.

Innovation Solution

A core-shell structure is developed, where silicon particulates less than 1 micrometer in size are surrounded by a silicon metal alloy composite and enveloped in a carbon-based buffering shell, stabilizing volume changes and improving cycle life and capacity while being economically scalable.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If silicon-based anodes are used to achieve high capacity, then capacity is improved, but cycle life is shortened due to large volume changes during cycling

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidcycle life
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The silicon anode is segmented into multiple small particulates (less than 1 micrometer in size) that are dispersed within a matrix material. This segmentation prevents the formation of large continuous silicon structures, allowing each particle to independently accommodate volume changes during lithium insertion/extraction, thereby maintaining structural integrity over many cycles while preserving high capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Silicon particulates are nested within a matrix material that provides structural support. The matrix acts as a container that constrains the silicon particles, allowing them to expand and contract during cycling without compromising the overall electrode structure. This nested configuration enables the silicon to achieve its high capacity while the matrix protects against volume change-induced failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If nanostructure is implemented to improve cycle life, then cycle life is improved, but manufacturing cost increases and scalability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle lifeVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the size parameter of silicon particulates to a specific range (less than 1 micrometer) that can be achieved through conventional milling and processing techniques. This parameter optimization provides nanostructure benefits for cycle life while remaining compatible with existing manufacturing processes, avoiding the need for expensive specialized nanofabrication equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The matrix material serves as a sacrificial or consumable component that provides structural support during cycling. By using abundant, inexpensive materials for the matrix (such as carbon-based materials or metal alloys), the invention achieves durable nanostructured silicon anodes without relying on costly precursor materials or complex processing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If silicon particulate size is reduced to less than 1 micrometer to improve cycle life, then cycle life is improved, but initial capacity loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle lifeVSAvoidinitial capacity loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The matrix material provides localized structural support and buffering around each silicon particulate. This local quality enhancement at the particle-matrix interface compensates for the high surface area to volume ratio of small particles, reducing electrolyte decomposition and solid electrolyte interface (SEI) formation on silicon surfaces, thereby minimizing initial capacity loss while maintaining the cycle life benefits of fine particulates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The core-shell structure achieves a cycle life of 80% capacity or greater at cycle 40 and specific capacities over 800 mAh/g, with reduced initial capacity loss and improved performance in electrochemical cells.

Implementation Method 1

electrochemically active materials that are capable of absorbing and desorbing an ion suitable for use in primary or secondary electrochemical cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

a core that includes a plurality of Si particulates surrounded by a matrix material that limits the surface Si volume change during cycling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS11515529B2Core-shell electrochemically active particles with modified microstructure and use for secondary battery electrodes
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 NAVITAS SYST
  • US11515529B2 patent drawing
  • US11515529B2 patent drawing
  • US11515529B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are electrochemically active materials capable of absorbing and desorbing an ion suitable for use in secondary cells. The provided materials include a core consisting of a plurality of silicon particulates of a particle size less than 1 micrometer, the particulates intermixed with and surrounded by a silicon metal alloy composite, and an electrochemically active buffering shell layer enveloping at least a portion of the core such that the resulting electrochemically active material has an overall particle size with a maximum linear dimension of greater than one micrometer.