Coreless Resonant Transformer With Asymmetric Coil Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing coreless power transformers achieve limited power transfer efficiencies due to the constraint of equal component values in their resonant circuits, which restricts design flexibility and magnetic coupling variations.

Innovation Solution

The design introduces a 4-coil coreless transformer system with non-equal resonant circuit component values and different magnetic couplings between coils, allowing for varied inductance, capacitance, and physical structure, thereby enhancing power transfer efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If equal component values are used in resonant circuits, then design simplicity is maintained, but power transfer efficiency is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transfer efficiencyVSAvoiddesign flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using non-equal component values in the two resonant circuits. Specifically, the first resonant circuit has inductance L1 and capacitance C1, while the second resonant circuit has inductance L2 and capacitance C2, where L1 ≠ L2 and/or C1 ≠ C2. This asymmetric configuration allows the natural frequencies to differ (ω1 ≠ ω2), providing additional degrees of freedom in design and enabling higher power transfer efficiency by optimizing magnetic coupling variations without being constrained to identical circuit parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Loss of energy

If non-equal resonant circuit component values are used, then power transfer efficiency is improved, but design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transfer efficiencyVSAvoiddesign flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by varying the inductance and capacitance values between the two resonant circuits. The first resonant circuit uses parameters L1 and C1, while the second uses L2 and C2, with deliberate differences in these parameters. This allows the natural frequencies ω1 = 1/√(L1C1) and ω2 = 1/√(L2C2) to be different, creating additional design flexibility and enabling optimization of power transfer efficiency through controlled magnetic coupling variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If equal natural frequencies are used in resonant circuits, then circuit symmetry is maintained, but magnetic coupling variations are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transfer efficiencyVSAvoidmagnetic coupling variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent breaks the symmetry constraint by allowing different natural frequencies in the two resonant circuits. By setting ω1 ≠ ω2 through different L and C values, the system gains additional degrees of freedom in magnetic coupling design. This asymmetric frequency configuration enables more flexible optimization of power transfer efficiency without being constrained to equal frequency operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in higher transfer efficiency factors, with S21 values exceeding 0.98, compared to traditional designs with equal resonant circuits, which typically achieve S21 values of about 0.967, leading to improved power transfer and reduced losses.

Implementation Method 1

a drive coil (21) that produces magnetic fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the first resonant coil (22) and the second resonant coil (23) are different in at least one of, or a combination of, the following: (a) the first resonant coil (22) and the second resonant coil (23) have different number of turns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic coupling: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS12301016B2Coreless power transformer design
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US12301016B2 patent drawing
  • US12301016B2 patent drawing
  • US12301016B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A primary resonant coil (22) and a secondary resonant coil (23) are different in the proposed improved coreless power transformer design, wherein the differences between the two resonant coils are achieved in two ways: (1) in the first difference, the two resonant coil windings are made to be different; for example, to have different number of turns, turn spacing and/or different wire sizes, and (2) the second difference is with the capacitance values of the two parallel capacitors each used to resonate their respective coils.