Non-Row Sensitive Corn Header Auger Threshing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing corn threshing headers are inefficient due to complex and redundant mechanisms such as row dividers, hoods, gathering chains, and stalk rolls, which waste energy and are not adaptable to non-uniform crop arrangements, leading to grain loss and increased debris accumulation.

Innovation Solution

A non-row sensitive corn threshing header with a forwardly disposed cutting apparatus and rearwardly disposed threshing apparatus using screw auger conveyors in upper and lower planes to separate kernels from the cob, eliminating the need for row dividers, hoods, and stalk rolls, and incorporating a transversely arranged cutting apparatus to handle crops regardless of orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If row dividers, hoods, gathering chains, and stalk rolls are used in the corn header, then the crop can be guided and processed through the header, but the device complexity increases and energy is wasted in redundant operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop guidance and processingVSAvoidheader structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes row dividers, hoods, gathering chains, and stalk rolls from the header structure. The cutting apparatus is positioned to cut the entire width of the crop without requiring these auxiliary components, thereby simplifying the overall device structure while maintaining operational effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting apparatus is designed to perform multiple functions: it cuts the entire width of the crop, guides the cut material rearwardly, and feeds it to the threshing apparatus without requiring separate specialized components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If row dividers and hoods are installed on the header, then crop damage is minimized in uniform row conditions, but the header becomes more vulnerable to damage when run aground and the structures serve no purpose when rows are evenly spaced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop protectionVSAvoidheader structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates row dividers and hoods from the header structure, removing components that provide conditional protection but create vulnerability and complexity. The cutting apparatus is designed to handle crops in both uniform and non-uniform arrangements without these auxiliary protective structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If gathering chains with paddles and multiple sprockets are used to move ears from stripping position to auger, then ears are conveyed through the header, but the system becomes complex and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveear conveyanceVSAvoidgathering mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes gathering chains, paddles, and multiple sprockets from the header. The cutting apparatus cuts the entire width of the crop and the cut material is conveyed rearwardly by the cutting apparatus itself and feed rolls, eliminating the need for separate gathering chain mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If stalk rolls with knives are used to engage and pull stalks downward for ear detachment, then the threshing function is performed, but the device complexity increases and the system is inefficient for the limited function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestalk processing and ear detachmentVSAvoidstalk roll mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates stalk rolls with knives from the header structure. The cutting apparatus cuts the entire width of the crop including the stalks, and the cut material is conveyed rearwardly to the threshing apparatus, removing the need for separate stalk roll mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The functions of cutting and conveying are merged into a single cutting apparatus system, and the threshing function is performed by a separate threshing apparatus, eliminating the need for intermediate stalk roll mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

5Ease of operation

If a cross auger is used to laterally move stripped ears toward the center, then ears are conveyed to the center for gathering, but kernels dislodged during stripping are not engaged and gather in outboard recesses causing grain loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveear lateral conveyanceVSAvoidkernel loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the cross auger from the header structure. The cutting apparatus cuts the entire width of the crop and conveys cut material rearwardly, and the threshing apparatus processes the material, eliminating the need for a separate cross auger and preventing kernel loss in outboard recesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

6Productivity

If the header processes crop in uniformly spaced rows with row-aligned cutting, then the crop can be harvested efficiently in ideal conditions, but the header is not adaptable to random crop arrangements and requires intensive planting requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiency in uniform rowsVSAvoidcrop arrangement adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting apparatus is designed to cut the entire width of the crop regardless of row arrangement. The apparatus can process both uniformly spaced rows and random crop arrangements, making the header versatile and adaptable to different planting conditions without requiring intensive planting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies the harvesting process, reduces energy consumption, and allows for efficient kernel separation from the plant, enabling the header to handle crops in random arrangements, thereby improving overall crop production efficiency and reducing maintenance and manufacturing costs.

Implementation Method 1

Pluralities of screw auger conveyors arranged in upper and lower planes receive the crop and urge the crop between converging surfaces defined by the screw flighting and expandingly tapered auger shanks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew conveyance: Archimedes Screw

Data Source

PatentEP3153006B1Non-row sensitive threshing corn header
Publication Date: 2018.12.12 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP3153006B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3153006B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3153006B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A non-row sensitive corn threshing header (15) comprising a forwardly disposed cutting apparatus (19) for severing standing corn crop from the ground and a rearwardly disposed threshing apparatus for separating kernels from the plant, collecting the kernels, and discarding the remaining plant. The threshing apparatus includes a plurality of screw auger conveyors (30, 40) arranged in upper and lower planes that receive the crop and urge the crop into diminishing space between adjacent auger conveyors (30, 40), the space defined by the auger flighting (34, 44) and the expandingly tapered auger shanks (32, 42). Kernels are separated from the cob as the ears are urged rearwardly in the threshing apparatus. The header (15) may include screens and the like for cleaning the grain of chaff prior to transferring to on-board storage or chaff removal may occur after the grain is off-loaded from the harvester.