Corneal Ablation Laser Energy Measurement Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laser systems for corneal ablation face challenges in accurately delivering laser energy to the cornea, leading to potential over-removal of corneal material due to energy fluctuations, which can result in insufficient or excessive correction of ametropia.

Innovation Solution

A laser system with a device for measuring the energy of laser beam pulses after they exit optical means, coupled to a control device that adjusts the operation of the laser source to ensure that only the intended amount of energy is delivered to the cornea, by terminating the laser source if energy thresholds are exceeded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the device for measuring energy is arranged directly behind the laser source, then the measurement is simple and direct, but the measured values do not reflect the actual energy reaching the cornea due to optical means losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary measurement device positioned between the optical means and the cornea. This mediator captures a portion of the laser beam after it passes through the optical means, allowing indirect measurement of the actual energy reaching the cornea without disrupting the main treatment beam path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement device provides real-time feedback on the actual energy reaching the cornea, which is then used to adjust the laser source output dynamically. This closed-loop feedback system ensures that despite variations in optical means transmission, the cornea receives the intended energy level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the laser source operates with fixed power settings, then the system is simple to control, but energy fluctuations cause over-removal or under-removal of corneal material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidablation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static fixed power settings to dynamic power adjustment. The laser source power is continuously modified based on real-time measurements of actual energy delivery, allowing the system to adapt to variations in optical means transmission and maintain precise ablation throughout the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes the laser source operating parameters (power output) based on measured energy levels. When the measurement device detects that actual energy delivery deviates from the intended energy, the control system adjusts the laser source parameters to compensate, ensuring consistent ablation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If more laser beam pulses are delivered to the cornea to ensure sufficient treatment, then complete correction is achieved, but excessive material removal occurs leading to overcorrection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment completenessVSAvoidovercorrection damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement device provides continuous feedback on the cumulative energy delivered to the cornea. The control system uses this feedback to monitor the total material removal and terminate the procedure when the intended correction is achieved, preventing overcorrection while ensuring complete treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent intentionally delivers slightly less energy per pulse than the maximum possible, using multiple pulses with real-time monitoring. This partial action approach, combined with feedback control, ensures that the cumulative effect achieves the desired correction without exceeding safe limits and causing overcorrection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures that no more material than planned is removed from the cornea, preventing overcorrection and ensuring precise energy delivery, thereby maintaining the integrity of the corneal tissue.

Implementation Method 1

the energy of the laser beam pulses can be measured by a suitable device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy measurement of laser beam: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

the laser source emits laser beam pulses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser emission: Laser

Implementation Method 3

the laser beam pulses are given a predetermined intensity profile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical modification of beam intensity: Focusing

Implementation Method 4

In the target device, the laser beam pulses are deflected in different directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam deflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 5

laser system for ablating cornea on a patient's eye

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 6

Too much material would then be removed from the cornea

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial removal by laser energy: Ablation

Data Source

PatentEP2127618B1Laser system to ablate cornea
Publication Date: 2011.11.02 SCHWIND EYE TECH SOLUTIONS GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2127618B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2127618B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The laser system (10') has a laser source (14) transmitting a laser-beam pulse (18) in operation, where the laser-beam pulse is changed by a beam shaping lens (20) before emerging from the system. An energy sensor (26) measures energy of the laser-beam pulse emerging from the shaping lens, and is connected with a central control unit (16). The control unit causes stopping of operation of the laser source, when amount of energy of another laser-beam pulse (18') emitted for beginning of laser ablation exceeds a predetermined threshold value. An independent claim is also included for a method for operating a laser system for ablating cornea in a patient eye.