Corneal Cut Depth Variation for Plasma Bubble Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for creating cut surfaces in the cornea during refractive eye surgery, such as LASIK and SMILE, face challenges with plasma bubbles forming during optical penetration, which reduce incision quality and may require higher laser power, leading to complications like the Opaque Bubble Layer.

Innovation Solution

A planning apparatus generates control data for the treatment device to create cut surfaces that are deeper around the edges than in the optically effective areas, ensuring the intended cut is made above the plasma bubble layer, thereby improving cut quality and reducing tissue damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If individual optical pulses are applied to create optical penetration in the cornea, then refractive correction can be achieved, but plasma bubbles form that reduce incision quality and may require higher laser power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincision qualityVSAvoidplasma bubbles
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The planning apparatus calculates and determines the precise depth of the cut surface before the actual laser treatment. By pre-determining the optimal cut depth that positions the incision above the plasma bubble layer, the system prepares the treatment plan in advance to avoid plasma bubble interference, thereby maintaining incision quality without requiring higher laser power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the depth parameter of the cut surface created by the laser. Instead of creating a uniform depth cut, the system determines a specific depth that positions the incision surface above where plasma bubbles form during optical penetration. This parameter adjustment allows the laser to operate at standard power levels while avoiding plasma bubble interference with the incision quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If higher laser power is used to maintain incision quality despite plasma bubbles, then cut precision can be maintained, but tissue damage increases and complications arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut precisionVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The planning apparatus performs preliminary calculation to determine the optimal cut depth that positions the incision above the plasma bubble layer. By establishing this depth parameter before treatment, the system enables precise cutting at standard laser power levels, eliminating the need to increase power and thereby preventing additional tissue damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the cap cut diameter is made larger than the lenticule cut diameter for clinical reasons, then surgical accessibility is improved, but the complexity of determining precise cut surfaces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical accessibilityVSAvoidcut surface determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The planning apparatus applies different depth characteristics to different regions of the cut surface. The system determines that the cut surface should have varying depth characteristics - deeper in certain areas and shallower in others - to account for the relationship between the larger cap cut diameter and the smaller lenticule cut diameter. This localized depth variation simplifies the overall determination process while maintaining surgical accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the quality of corneal cuts, leading to better healing outcomes and reduced complications by preventing plasma bubbles from interfering with the laser beam, thus ensuring more precise and effective refractive corrections.

Implementation Method 1

When creating a cut surface in the cornea using a laser beam, the optical beam effect is usually used to create optical penetration by application of individual optical pulses with a duration of between approximately 100 fs and 100 ns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical penetration: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

bubbles of plasma arising during the optical penetration also tend to spread in the cornea tissue and therefore reduce the effectiveness of the laser beam in neighboring areas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma bubble formation: Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS10492953B2Eye surgery procedure
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC AG
  • US10492953B2 patent drawing
  • US10492953B2 patent drawing
  • US10492953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A planning apparatus for generating control data for an eye surgery treatment device which creates at least one cut surface in the cornea using a laser device. The planning apparatus includes a calculation tool for determining the at least one cut surface in the cornea. The calculation tool determines the at least one cut surface in the cornea based on data from a refractive correction and generates a set of control data that control the laser device for the at least one cut surface in the cornea. The at least one cut surface in the cornea includes an edge and optically effective areas. The calculation tool determines the at least one cut surface in the cornea such the at least one cut surface in the cornea is deeper at the edge than in the optically effective areas.