Corneal Microshunt for Glaucoma Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for glaucoma, particularly in humans and veterinary medicine, face challenges such as high costs, inefficacy, and complications, especially in managing acute angle-closure glaucoma in animals, due to anatomical differences and the need for invasive surgeries that are expensive and often ineffective in the long term.

Innovation Solution

A microshunt device is implanted in the cornea to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the surface of the cornea, bypassing the trabecular meshwork, with a flow-restricting member to control intraocular pressure and prevent migration, allowing for controlled fluid flow and potential adjustment of leakage rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional surgical procedures are used to treat glaucoma, then intraocular pressure can be controlled, but the procedures are invasive, expensive, and have poor long-term effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term effectiveness of glaucoma treatmentVSAvoidinvasiveness and complexity of surgical procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the treatment approach by using a minimally invasive corneal implantation method instead of traditional extensive surgery. The microshunt device with controllable flow restriction allows adjustment of drainage parameters to achieve effective pressure control with less invasive procedures, improving long-term effectiveness while reducing procedural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The corneal implant acts as an intermediary device that creates a new drainage pathway through the cornea, bypassing the blocked traditional drainage angle. This intermediate solution provides an alternative route for aqueous humor drainage, achieving pressure control without the need for complex traditional surgery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If traditional glaucoma surgery is performed, then fluid drainage can be improved, but the cost and procedural complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid drainage efficiencyVSAvoidsurgical procedure complexity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the drainage function by creating a separate, dedicated microshunt pathway through the cornea, independent of the traditional drainage angle structures. This segmented approach improves fluid drainage efficiency by providing a direct route while simplifying the overall procedure compared to manipulating complex traditional drainage structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If medications are used to control glaucoma, then intraocular pressure can be reduced, but side effects occur and long-term control is frequently ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term control of intraocular pressureVSAvoidside effects of medication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the chemical mechanism of medications with a mechanical drainage enhancement system. The corneal implant provides a physical pathway for improved aqueous humor drainage, eliminating medication side effects while achieving reliable long-term pressure control through mechanical fluid dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If multiple surgeries are required to control glaucoma, then pressure control may be achieved, but the treatment becomes more expensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglaucoma control achievementVSAvoidtime and cost of multiple surgical procedures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a flow-restricting member in advance within the implant device to pre-regulate drainage flow. This preliminary configuration ensures effective pressure control from the first implantation, eliminating the need for multiple corrective surgeries and reducing overall treatment time and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The microshunt device provides a less invasive, cost-effective, and more effective means of controlling intraocular pressure, potentially reducing the risk of complications and enabling outpatient procedures, thereby improving the prognosis for glaucoma management in both humans and animals.

Implementation Method 1

The microshunt device effects the flow of aqueous humor from an anterior chamber of the eye to the anterior surface of the cornea, bypassing the trabecular meshwork

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 2

a flow-restricting member to control intraocular pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow restriction:

Data Source

PatentUS11992436B2Method and apparatus for inserting an implant in the cornea of the eye
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 DA SILVA CURIEL JEANNETTE M A
  • US11992436B2 patent drawing
  • US11992436B2 patent drawing
  • US11992436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, devices, and systems are presented for inserting an implant in the cornea of the eye, where the implant is a microshunt; a microshunt delivery device for delivering the microshunt into the cornea may comprise the microshunt, an actuator, and a suction stabilizer; a vacuum device may be inserted in the stabilizer such that the cornea may be sucked onto a concave bottom side of the stabilizer; the microshunt may then be inserted into a hole in the suction stabilizer with the actuator; the actuator may be turned to screw the microshunt into a hole in the cornea; and the actuator may be removed from the suction stabilizer, breaking the vacuum seal and leaving the microshunt inserted in the cornea.