Real-Time Coronary Angiography Analysis Using Dynamic Acquisition Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing coronary disease using X-ray angiography face challenges in achieving reliable, repeatable, and objective assessments due to patient variability and suboptimal acquisition settings, leading to inefficient and potentially harmful radiation and contrast agent doses.

Innovation Solution

A method employing a trained classifying device, such as a convolutional neural network, to analyze diagnostic image data during acquisition, adjusting acquisition settings in real-time to optimize image quality and reduce variability, while minimizing radiation and contrast agent use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pre-defined acquisition settings are used to reduce variability in acquired data, then measurement precision is improved, but adaptability to individual patient anatomy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity of coronary disease assessmentVSAvoidadaptation to patient-dependent anatomy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts acquisition settings during the imaging process based on real-time analysis of quantitative features extracted from acquired images. The classifying device processes images as they are acquired and modifies parameters such as projection angles, contrast agent injection rates, and radiation doses adaptively, transforming a static pre-defined acquisition protocol into a dynamic, patient-specific optimized process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where quantitative features are continuously extracted from acquired angiographic images, compared against reference values or thresholds, and used to automatically adjust subsequent acquisition parameters. This closed-loop control ensures that the acquisition settings are optimized based on actual image quality and diagnostic information obtained so far, resolving the contradiction between standardized protocols and patient-specific adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If complex calculations are performed to account for all variabilities in data from different patients, then reliability of analysis is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of automated data analysisVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex manual analysis and sophisticated calculation algorithms with a trained classifying device, likely a neural network or machine learning model. This classifying device has been pre-trained on diverse patient data to automatically recognize patterns and extract quantitative features, substituting complex computational mechanisms with a trained intelligent system that provides reliable analysis with simpler operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The classifying device is pre-trained using extensive training data that encompasses various patient anatomies and pathologies. This preliminary training phase performs the complex calculations and pattern recognition work in advance, allowing the deployed system to make reliable classifications and extractions with minimal real-time computational complexity, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If acquisition settings are optimized for each patient individually, then image quality is improved, but loss of time increases due to manual adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of angiographic image dataVSAvoidtime for acquisition setup
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing acquired images, extracting quantitative features, and adjusting acquisition parameters without requiring manual intervention from operators. The classifying device autonomously optimizes the acquisition process in real-time, eliminating the time-consuming manual adjustment phase while maintaining high image quality through patient-specific adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization process occurs continuously during the acquisition itself rather than requiring separate setup and adjustment phases. The system analyzes images as they are acquired and makes real-time parameter adjustments, ensuring that the useful action of image acquisition and optimization proceeds without interruption or time loss, resolving the contradiction between quality optimization and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Measurement precision

If high doses of radiation and contrast agent are used to ensure diagnostic quality images, then measurement precision is improved, but object-affected harmful factors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic quality of imagesVSAvoidradiation dose and contrast agent dose
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by acquiring and analyzing images incrementally, extracting quantitative features from the subset of images already acquired. Based on this partial information, the system determines whether sufficient diagnostic quality has been achieved or if additional images are needed, avoiding the excessive application of radiation and contrast agent that would result from acquiring complete image sets regardless of diagnostic sufficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The real-time feedback loop continuously evaluates image quality metrics and quantitative features extracted from acquired images, comparing them against diagnostic requirements. This feedback mechanism allows the system to terminate acquisition early when diagnostic quality is sufficient, preventing unnecessary exposure to radiation and contrast agent while maintaining measurement precision through adaptive optimization of the acquisition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable, efficient, and patient-independent assessment of coronary disease by optimizing acquisition settings during imaging, reducing radiation and contrast agent doses, and improving diagnostic image quality.

Implementation Method 1

classifying the diagnostic image data to extract at least one quantitative feature of the vessel of interest from at least one acquisition image of the plurality of acquisition images

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage classification and feature extraction: Image Processing

Data Source

PatentUS12198335B2Automated coronary angiography analysis
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US12198335B2 patent drawing
  • US12198335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for analyzing diagnostic image data are provided in which a plurality of acquisition images of a vessel of interest having been acquired with a pre-defined acquisition method is received at a trained classifying device and classified, by the classifying device, to extract at least one quantitative feature of the vessel of interest from at least one acquisition image of the plurality of acquisition images. The at least one quantitative feature is then output associated with the at least one acquisition image while the acquisition of the diagnostic image data is still in progress and one or more adjustable image acquisition settings are adjusted based on the at least one quantitative feature to optimize the acquisition of the diagnostic image data.