Coronary Image Evaluation With Explainable Rule-Based AI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical imaging evaluation systems, particularly for coronary artery disease, lack transparency and interactivity, with artificial intelligence algorithms providing unexplainable results and requiring significant user time for manual interaction.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that segments and labels anatomical structures using evaluation algorithms, applies inference rules to generate comprehensible evaluation information, and allows user interaction for modification, integrating deep learning and traditional rule-based systems to provide traceable and understandable assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If artificial intelligence evaluation algorithms are used to automate medical image assessment, then productivity increases, but the comprehensibility and explainability of results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation efficiencyVSAvoidcomprehensibility of results
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the deep learning algorithm and the final evaluation result. This intermediary consists of rule-based systems that translate the black-box AI outputs into comprehensible medical concepts and criteria, allowing users to understand how conclusions were reached while maintaining automated evaluation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system is segmented into multiple independent components: deep learning algorithms for feature extraction, rule-based systems for logical reasoning, and separate modules for different evaluation criteria. This segmentation allows each component to specialize while maintaining overall system transparency and explainability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If manual evaluation by physicians is performed, then comprehensibility of results is maintained, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensibility of resultsVSAvoidevaluation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the strengths of manual evaluation (comprehensibility, medical expertise) with automated systems (efficiency, consistency). Physician knowledge is encoded into rule-based systems that work alongside AI algorithms, creating a hybrid system that maintains human-level comprehensibility while achieving automated productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated evaluation using deep learning and rule-based systems before final physician review. This preliminary action handles routine assessments efficiently, allowing physicians to focus only on complex or ambiguous cases, thereby improving overall productivity while maintaining comprehensibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If deep learning algorithms are used to mimic complex disease assessment schemes, then productivity increases, but device complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Rule-based systems serve as intermediaries that simplify the interface between complex deep learning algorithms and users. These rules translate complex AI outputs into straightforward medical criteria and decision pathways, reducing perceived system complexity while maintaining automated evaluation capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where evaluation results and intermediate findings are continuously fed back through rule-based systems that can adjust and refine outputs. This feedback loop simplifies complex decision-making processes by making them iterative and transparent, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12362060B2Computer-implemented methods and evaluation systems for evaluating at least one image data set of an imaging region of a patient, computer programs and electronically readable storage mediums
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US12362060B2 patent drawing
  • US12362060B2 patent drawing
  • US12362060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

At least one example embodiment provides a computer-implemented method for evaluating at least one image data set of an imaging region of a patient, wherein at least one evaluation information describing at least one medical condition in an anatomical structure of the imaging region is determined.