Correcting Systematic Defects in Set Top Box Tuning Volume Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Audience measurement entities face inaccuracies in tuning volume data collected from set top boxes due to systematic defects, such as incorrect reporting of set top box states and power outages, which are not currently corrected in conventional media monitoring techniques.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method to identify and correct systematic tuning data defects by comparing raw tuning volume data from return path data with monitored data, flagging suspect time windows and modifying specific return path data entries using statistical models to ensure accurate representation of set top box behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional media monitoring techniques are used to collect tuning volume data from set top boxes, then data collection is simple and does not require additional hardware, but the data contains systematic defects such as incorrect reporting of set top box states and power outages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of tuning volume dataVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of suspect time windows by comparing return path data with monitoring data before final data correction. This preliminary action flags problematic periods for targeted correction, improving accuracy without processing entire datasets unnecessarily.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces monitoring data as an intermediary reference to identify and correct defects in return path data. By comparing return path data with independent monitoring data, the system detects systematic defects and uses the monitoring data as a basis for correction without requiring additional hardware at the set top box level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If return path data is used for audience measurement, then no additional hardware installation is required, but systematic tuning defects remain uncorrected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of data collectionVSAvoidreliability of tuning volume data
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses monitoring data as feedback to identify systematic defects in return path data. By continuously comparing return path data with monitoring data and identifying suspect time windows, the system creates a feedback loop that enables automatic detection and correction of reliability issues without changing the data collection method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If statistical models are used to correct return path data entries, then accuracy of tuning volume data improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of corrected tuning volume dataVSAvoidtime for data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the correction process into distinct phases: identifying suspect time windows, selecting return path data entries within those windows, and applying statistical models only to selected entries. This segmentation reduces the overall processing time by limiting statistical model application to only the data that requires correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies statistical correction only to specific return path data entries that fall within suspect time windows, rather than correcting all data uniformly. This partial action approach maintains high accuracy for problematic data while minimizing unnecessary processing of already-reliable data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11102531B2Correcting systematic tuning defects
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 THE NIELSEN CO (US) LLC
  • US11102531B2 patent drawing
  • US11102531B2 patent drawing
  • US11102531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus, systems, articles of manufacture, and methods are disclosed for correcting systematic tuning defects. An example apparatus includes a defect analyzer to identify a suspect time window in tuning volume data of return path data reported by set top boxes. The example apparatus further includes a return path data transformer to identify a first return path data entry indicating a first set top box reported a first transition to an off state at a first time during the suspect time window and to modify the first return path data entry to (1) eliminate the first transition to the off state at the first time and (2) assign the first return path data entry a first duration to remain in an on state after the first time, where the first duration is determined based on monitoring data reported from media device meters monitoring media presentation devices.