Brine Concentration Prediction Using Corrected Activity Coefficients

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for predicting precipitates and component concentrations during brine concentration processes suffer from inaccuracies due to errors in activity coefficient calculations, leading to significant deviations in predicting the type and amount of precipitates, which results in lithium loss and process inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A brine concentration process prediction system that includes data collection, preprocessing, processing, and prediction units to calculate solubility and concentration of precipitates using non-linear regression and machine learning, correcting activity coefficients based on ionic strength and concentration, and accounting for CO2 absorption to improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used to predict precipitates and component concentrations, then the prediction process is simple, but the accuracy is low due to errors in activity coefficient calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used in calculations by introducing corrected activity coefficients that account for ionic strength and concentration effects. Instead of using traditional fixed activity coefficients, the system dynamically calculates corrected values based on measured brine composition, thereby improving prediction accuracy without requiring overly complex computational models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback by using measured values of brine composition (Na, K, Mg, Ca, Li concentrations) to correct activity coefficients in real-time. This feedback loop allows the prediction model to continuously improve its accuracy by adjusting activity coefficients based on actual brine conditions, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If activity coefficient calculations are performed with traditional methods, then the calculation process is straightforward, but significant deviations occur in predicting precipitate types and amounts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecipitate prediction accuracyVSAvoidlithium loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by correcting activity coefficients before performing precipitate calculations. By pre-correcting activity coefficients based on ionic strength and concentration, the system prevents significant deviations in precipitate predictions from occurring in the first place, thereby avoiding lithium loss that would result from inaccurate predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides beforehand cushioning by incorporating correction factors that compensate for calculation errors before they can affect the final predictions. The corrected activity coefficients act as a cushion against the inherent inaccuracies of traditional calculation methods, ensuring reliable precipitate type and amount predictions that prevent lithium loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If precise prediction of precipitates is achieved through improved activity coefficient corrections, then lithium production efficiency increases, but the calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelithium production efficiencyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent improves lithium production efficiency by changing the calculation parameters to include corrected activity coefficients that reflect actual brine conditions. This parameter change enables more accurate precipitate predictions, allowing better control of the concentration process and reduced lithium loss, while the complexity increase is manageable through systematic correction formulas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If traditional prediction methods are used, then the process is easier to implement, but significant lithium is lost to precipitates and water content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield calculation reliabilityVSAvoidlithium loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system enhances yield calculation reliability by implementing feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor and adjust activity coefficients based on actual brine composition measurements. This feedback ensures that predictions accurately reflect real-time conditions, preventing lithium loss to precipitates and improving the reliability of yield calculations throughout the concentration process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves precise prediction of precipitate types and concentrations with an error range of 5% or less, enhancing lithium production efficiency and process control.

Implementation Method 1

a data processing unit calculating a solubility of each precipitate component using the data converted by the data preprocessing unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNon-linear regression analysis:

Implementation Method 2

calculate a solubility of each precipitate component through multiple non-linear regression analysis or machine learning

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMachine learning:

Implementation Method 3

correcting activity coefficients based on ionic strength and concentration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonic strength correction:

Implementation Method 4

accounting for CO2 absorption to improve accuracy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCO2 absorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP4636384A1Brine concentrating process prediction system
Publication Date: 2025.10.22 POSCO HLDG INC
  • EP4636384A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4636384A1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(b)
  • EP4636384A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments may provide a brine concentration process prediction system, the brine concentration process prediction system including: a data collection unit collecting data of an initial brine and a high-concentration brine; a data preprocessing unit converting the data collected by the data collection unit to be applied to a data processing unit provided at a later stage; a data processing unit calculating a solubility of each precipitate component using the data converted by the data preprocessing unit; and a data prediction unit predicting a final amount of precipitates and a concentration of each ion component in a final concentrated brine using the solubility of each precipitate component calculated by the data processing unit.