Correction Rate Predictor for Medical Dictations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current speech recognition systems in healthcare require significant editing of automatically transcribed medical records, which can be time-consuming and costly, especially when draft transcriptions from limited training data result in lower quality outputs, necessitating extensive corrections by medical transcriptionists.

Innovation Solution

A computer program product that predicts the correction rate of medical record dictations by analyzing features such as background noise, audio quality, and per-word confidence, determining whether to provide a draft transcription for editing, thereby optimizing the editing process and reducing transcriptionist workload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic speech recognition is used to transcribe medical dictations, then transcription speed is improved, but transcription accuracy deteriorates requiring extensive editing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription speedVSAvoidtranscription accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

A correction rate predictor is introduced as an intermediary between the automatic speech recognition system and medical transcriptionists. This predictor analyzes features of dictations (audio quality, background noise, speaker characteristics) to estimate the correction rate before transcriptionists begin work, allowing intelligent routing of dictations that need minimal correction versus those requiring extensive editing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automatic classification and routing of dictations based on their predicted correction rates. High-quality dictations with low predicted correction rates can be processed automatically or with minimal human intervention, while low-quality dictations are selectively routed to transcriptionists, allowing the system to self-optimize its workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If more training data is collected to improve speech recognition accuracy, then transcription quality is improved, but system complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The correction rate predictor is built and trained in advance using historical dictation data and outcomes. This preliminary action creates a pre-computed model that can quickly assess new dictations without requiring real-time analysis or additional training data collection during the transcription process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring extensive training data for every possible speaker and medical specialty, the system uses a partial approach by training the correction rate predictor on representative samples. The predictor learns general patterns of dictation quality that apply across different speakers and contexts, providing sufficient accuracy without exhaustive data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If medical transcriptionists edit all automatically transcribed records, then transcription accuracy is improved, but time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription accuracyVSAvoidediting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by using the correction rate predictor to inform transcriptionist workflow decisions. The predictor provides real-time or near-real-time assessments of dictation quality, allowing transcriptionists to prioritize their work based on predicted correction needs, and enabling managers to optimize resource allocation based on actual dictation characteristics rather than uniform processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8032372B1Dictation selection
Publication Date: 2011.10.04 DELIVERHEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US8032372B1 patent drawing
  • US8032372B1 patent drawing
  • US8032372B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer program product for computing a correction rate predictor for medical record dictations, the computer program product residing on a computer-readable medium includes computer-readable instructions for causing a computer to obtain a draft medical transcription of at least a portion of a dictation, the dictation being from medical personnel and concerning a patient, determine features of the dictation to produce a feature set comprising a combination of features of the dictation, the features being relevant to a quantity of transcription errors in the transcription, analyze the feature set to compute a predicted correction rate associated with the dictation and use the predicted correction rate to determine whether to provide at least a portion of the transcription to a transcriptionist.