Correlation Scoring for Data Retrieval Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current information management systems lack the ability to effectively distinguish and manage data with high degrees of correlation, leading to inefficiencies in data utilization and retrieval.

Innovation Solution

An information management device and system that correlate data based on their utilization patterns, using a correlation scoring system to prioritize and output data with high correlation, incorporating a data storage unit, utilization unit, correlation giving unit, search unit, and score storage unit to accumulate and control the output of correlated data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If data are managed without correlation scoring, then the system is simpler to operate, but data with high correlation cannot be distinguished and prioritized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrelation distinction capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data management into distinct functional modules: a correlation giving unit that assigns correlation scores, a search unit that queries data, and a result output unit that prioritizes results. This segmentation allows the correlation scoring mechanism to be implemented as a separate, manageable component rather than a monolithic system, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The correlation score acts as an intermediary element between raw data and user queries. Instead of directly analyzing complex data relationships, the system uses correlation scores as a simplified mediator that encapsulates correlation information and enables efficient retrieval. This intermediary approach improves correlation distinction capability while maintaining relatively simple system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual correlation instruction is required, then the system requires less automated processing, but data retrieval efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retrieval efficiencyVSAvoidautomatic correlation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The correlation giving unit performs preliminary action by automatically calculating and storing correlation scores between data items before user queries are received. This pre-computation of correlation relationships eliminates the need for manual correlation instructions during data retrieval, significantly improving productivity while implementing automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by automatically generating and maintaining correlation information without requiring user intervention. The correlation giving unit autonomously processes data relationships and updates correlation scores based on data utilization patterns, enabling the system to serve itself rather than requiring manual correlation setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If all data are treated equally, then the system is easier to implement, but relevant data cannot be prioritized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevant data prioritizationVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by assigning different weights or priorities to different data items based on their correlation scores. Instead of treating all data uniformly, the result output unit selectively emphasizes data with higher correlation scores, providing localized prioritization that reduces information loss while maintaining manageable system complexity through score-based differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of data priority by introducing correlation scores as a new dimension for data evaluation. This parameter change enables the system to distinguish and prioritize relevant data without fundamentally altering the basic data management structure, thus reducing information loss while keeping device complexity relatively low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7685111B2Information management device, information management system, and computer usable medium
Publication Date: 2010.03.23 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US7685111B2 patent drawing
  • US7685111B2 patent drawing
  • US7685111B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One identification information piece to identify one data correlated with another data can be output as being correlated with the another data. In addition, when the one data is displayed or printed on the basis of the output one identification information piece or when another data associated with the one data is searched out, a score is given to the correlation of the one data with the another data and the one data correlated with the another data is preferentially output in accordance with the score.