Correlithm Object Processing for Data Similarity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional computers rely on ordinal numbers for data processing, which only provide information about sequence order and fail to compare data samples for similarity, leading to complex signal processing challenges and reduced performance in applications like facial recognition and fraud detection.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a correlithm object processing system that uses categorical numbers and correlithm objects to represent data samples, enabling non-binary comparisons and quantifying similarity between data samples, regardless of their type or format.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional computers use ordinal binary integers to represent and manipulate data samples, then they can perform basic operations like counting, sorting, and indexing, but they cannot determine similarity between different data samples without complex signal processing techniques

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimilarity determination capabilityVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the parameter system from ordinal binary integers to correlithm objects with categorical number properties. This fundamental parameter change enables direct similarity determination through property comparison rather than complex computational processing, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/computational signal processing system with a correlithm object comparison system. Instead of using traditional computational methods to analyze and compare data samples, the system uses correlithm objects whose inherent properties directly represent similarity relationships, eliminating the need for complex processing algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If conventional computers rely on complex signal processing techniques to compare data samples for similarity, then they can determine matches, but processing speed and system performance are reduced due to high computational power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata sample comparison accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the similarity determination function from complex computational processes and embeds it directly into the correlithm object structure. By taking out the comparison logic from the processing system and incorporating it into the data representation itself, the system achieves fast similarity determination without computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The correlithm objects are designed to self-determine similarity through their inherent property comparisons. The objects automatically indicate similarity relationships through their structure and properties, eliminating the need for external processing systems to perform complex analysis, thereby increasing processing speed while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If conventional computers use ordinal numbers to represent data samples, then they can store and manipulate information efficiently, but they lose information about relationships between data samples such as similarity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation storage capacityVSAvoidrelationship information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the data storage function with the relationship representation function into the correlithm object structure. The same correlithm objects that store data samples also encode similarity relationships through their properties and correlations, eliminating the need for separate structures and preserving relationship information alongside quantitative data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Speed

If conventional computers perform exact match comparisons using ordinal numbers, then they can quickly determine equality, but they cannot identify similar data samples that do not match exactly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomparison speedVSAvoidsimilarity detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic similarity thresholds and flexible matching criteria through the correlithm object comparison mechanism. The system can adapt the stringency of comparisons by adjusting correlation thresholds, enabling both fast exact matches and flexible similarity detection within a unified framework, thus achieving both speed and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11263290B2Computer architecture for emulating a bidirectional string correlithm object generator in a correlithm object processing system
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US11263290B2 patent drawing
  • US11263290B2 patent drawing
  • US11263290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device configured to emulate a bidirectional string correlithm object generator includes multiple processing stages that operate together to output a bidirectional string correlithm object. The bidirectional string correlithm object includes sub-string correlithm objects that extend in different n-dimensional directions from a central sub-string correlithm object.