Cosmetic Compact Hinge With Removable Pans and Segmented Spine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cosmetic compacts with plastic hinges are prone to breaking under stress, and conventional manufacturing processes require separate labeling steps, increasing costs and vulnerability to damage.

Innovation Solution

A cosmetic compact design featuring a spine with extensions that allows for an unlocked and locked position, incorporating outer wrap material into the assembly process, and using magnets for secure closure, enabling easy replacement of pans and enhancing hinge durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional plastic hinges are used to connect the cover and base, then the compact can be assembled easily, but the hinge is prone to breaking under stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidhinge durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge is divided into two separate components: a first hinge portion integrated into the base and a second hinge portion integrated into the cover. These segments connect through a hinge connection that allows relative movement, distributing stress across multiple connection points rather than relying on a single plastic hinge, thereby improving durability while maintaining ease of assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge connection merges the first and second hinge portions into a unified rotating joint mechanism. This combined structure allows the cover and base to rotate relative to each other while sharing the mechanical load, preventing the single-point failure that plagues conventional plastic hinges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If labeling is performed as a separate step after assembly, then the compact can be manufactured, but the cost increases considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The labeling operation is merged with the assembly process by applying labels to components (cover, base, or hinge portions) before they are final assembled. This integration allows labeling and assembly to occur in a unified manufacturing flow, eliminating separate labeling steps and reducing overall manufacturing cost while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Labeling is performed as a preliminary action during the assembly process rather than as a post-assembly step. By pre-applying labels to components before final assembly, the manufacturing process streamlines operations and reduces the number of discrete steps required, thereby lowering costs while preserving production efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If pans are secured with adhesive materials, then the pans are held in place, but the replacement of pans becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepan securityVSAvoidpan replacement ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The pan retention system transitions from a static adhesive bond to a dynamic mechanical locking mechanism. The extensions can be positioned to engage with the base structure, providing secure retention through reversible mechanical interference rather than permanent adhesive bonding, enabling easy pan replacement while maintaining security during use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive material is extracted from the pan retention system and replaced with a mechanical locking mechanism using extensions and structural engagement. This removal of adhesive allows for non-destructive, tool-free pan replacement while maintaining secure pan retention through the mechanical extension-base interaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If the hinge is made more durable, then the compact structure is strengthened, but the complexity of the hinge increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinge durabilityVSAvoidhinge structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge is segmented into two portions (first in base, second in cover) that connect through a simple hinge connection interface. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall structural integrity, achieving enhanced durability without requiring complex hinge mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge connection serves multiple functions: it connects the cover and base, allows relative rotation, and provides structural support. By designing the hinge portions to fulfill multiple roles simultaneously, the system achieves durability without adding unnecessary complexity, as the same structural elements perform several functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides a more durable hinge, allows for easier assembly with integrated labeling, and facilitates the replacement of pans, reducing costs and improving the compact's structural integrity.

Implementation Method 1

The cover and the base can include magnets for magnetically securing the cover to the base when the cosmetic compact is in a closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11470941B2Cosmetic compact with removable cosmetic pans
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 KORBA GARY
  • US11470941B2 patent drawing
  • US11470941B2 patent drawing
  • US11470941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cosmetic compact including a hinge, the hinge including a spine having at least two extensions and at least two protrusions extending from the at least two extensions; a base, the base including at least two receivers and at least one opening configured to receive at least one pan; and a cover, wherein the cover and the base are connected to one another via the hinge. The spine having (1) a locked position wherein the extensions are configured to wrap around the base and the at least two protrusions are configured to be removably locked into the at least two receivers thereby securing the at least one pan within the at least one opening, and (2) an unlocked position wherein the at least two protrusions are configured to be removed from the at least two receivers thereby providing access to the at least one opening.