Lock-in Cosmetic Sleeve with Spring Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cosmetic accessory designs lack a reliable and secure mechanism to hold multiple cosmetic containers simultaneously, with existing solutions often being cumbersome or difficult to use.

Innovation Solution

A lock-in cosmetic accessory sleeve with engageable and constriction means, featuring a first and second open end, a fixed vertical inner wall, and a spring-like mechanism to securely and releaseably hold cosmetic containers, allowing for easy insertion and removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a secure mechanism is used to hold multiple cosmetic containers, then reliability of holding is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding securityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cosmetic accessory is divided into separate functional components: a sleeve structure with multiple openings for holding different containers, and distinct engagement mechanisms (such as clips or latches) at each opening. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, achieving reliable holding of multiple containers without requiring a complex integrated mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design nests cosmetic containers within the sleeve structure, with each container fitting into its own designated opening or compartment. The engagement mechanisms are nested within the sleeve structure itself, allowing them to deploy outward to secure containers. This nesting approach enables multiple containers to be held securely in a compact arrangement without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If a secure engagement mechanism is implemented, then holding reliability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding securityVSAvoidinsertion and removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The engagement mechanisms are pre-positioned in an open or disengaged state within the sleeve structure, ready to automatically secure containers upon insertion. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for manual activation during the insertion process, allowing users to simply place containers into the openings while the mechanisms automatically engage to provide secure holding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring users to manually engage locking mechanisms to secure containers, the design inverts the operation: containers are inserted first, and the engagement mechanisms are designed to automatically snap or latch onto the containers upon insertion. This inversion simplifies the user action to mere insertion while maintaining secure holding through automatic engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Quantity of substance

If multiple cosmetic containers are held simultaneously, then quantity of containers is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of containersVSAvoidsleeve structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sleeve structure is designed as a universal holder with multiple standardized openings that can accommodate different types and sizes of cosmetic containers. Each opening is equipped with a similar engagement mechanism, allowing the same basic structure to securely hold multiple containers simultaneously. This multi-functional design enables the sleeve to increase container quantity without requiring unique complex structures for each container type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a secure and easy-to-use method for carrying and storing multiple cosmetic accessories, ensuring they are securely held within the sleeve while allowing for easy access and removal, enhancing user convenience.

Implementation Method 1

at least one first spring-like means to releaseably engage with an end surface of said first cosmetic accessory

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9237794B2Lock-in cosmetic accessory sleeve apparatus having engageable and/or constriction means
Publication Date: 2016.01.19 IRVING KATIE MARGUERITE
  • US9237794B2 patent drawing
  • US9237794B2 patent drawing
  • US9237794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates generally to a cosmetic apparatus. More particularly, the invention encompasses an accessory sleeve for a cosmetic item. The present invention is also directed to a novel lock-in cosmetic accessory sleeve. The accessory sleeve has a first opening to securely and releaseably accommodate a first cosmetic container, and a second opening to securely and releaseably accommodate a second cosmetic container. The accessory sleeve and/or the containers have at least one releaseable engagement means to securely hold each to the other. The lock-in cosmetic accessory sleeve has at least one engageable and/or constriction means to engage with and securely, and releaseably, hold a first cosmetic container at a first open end, and/or to engage with and securely, and releaseably, hold a second cosmetic container at a second open end. The constriction means could be at least one leaf spring type means.