Cost-Estimating Detection Unit for Infrastructure Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image-based inspection methods for detecting deformations in infrastructural structures, such as cracks in concrete walls, face challenges with incomplete detection and errors, requiring manual correction which incurs costs, and adjusting detection models for improved accuracy also comes with temporal and monetary costs.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that includes a detection unit, a correction cost estimation unit, and an adjustment cost estimation unit, allowing users to compare and decide between correcting or reprocessing detection results, enabling efficient cost management in obtaining accurate deformation detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual correction is performed to improve detection accuracy, then detection precision is improved, but time cost and labor cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcorrection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically evaluates detection results and performs corrections without requiring manual intervention. The correction processing unit automatically identifies erroneous detections and ommissions, and the teaching data generation unit creates training data from corrected results, enabling the system to self-improve detection accuracy without human time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where detection results are automatically evaluated, corrected errors are identified, and corrected data is used to generate teaching data for retraining the detection model. This continuous feedback mechanism improves detection accuracy automatically over time without requiring manual correction input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If detection model is adjusted and retrained to improve detection accuracy, then detection precision is improved, but temporal cost and monetary cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidretraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of detection results to identify areas needing improvement before retraining is necessary. By automatically evaluating detection accuracy and generating teaching data from corrected results, the system prepares training materials in advance, reducing the overall retraining time and computational resources required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for detection by generating new teaching data from corrected detection results. This involves modifying the training dataset parameters rather than fundamentally retraining the entire model, which reduces time and computational cost while still improving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automatic detection is used to reduce manual work, then productivity is improved, but detection accuracy decreases due to erroneous detection and omission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system performs self-correction by automatically evaluating its own detection results, identifying erroneous detections and ommissions, and generating corrected teaching data. This self-service capability allows the system to maintain high productivity while automatically improving accuracy without requiring continuous manual oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

An automatic feedback mechanism evaluates detection results and feeds corrected information back into the system. The correction processing unit identifies errors and the teaching data generation unit creates improved training data, which is then used to retrain the detection model, continuously improving accuracy while maintaining automated high-speed processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12112462B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 CANON KK
  • US12112462B2 patent drawing
  • US12112462B2 patent drawing
  • US12112462B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A detection unit configured to detect a detection target from an image to be processed by detection processing capable of adjusting at least one setting, a correction cost estimation unit configured to estimate a correction cost needed for correction needed in a case where a result of detection by the detection unit is corrected, an adjustment cost estimation unit configured to estimate an adjustment cost needed in a case where the setting of the detection processing is adjusted to the detection target, and a display control unit configured to perform control to display the correction cost and the adjustment cost on a display unit in a comparable manner are included.