Cost Function Adjustment for Post-Change Device Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to efficiently adjust parameters in response to changes in device environments, such as camera position or sensor type, due to unknown sensor characteristics and environmental dependencies, leading to time-consuming recalibration.

Innovation Solution

An adjustment system that utilizes an input unit for pre-change and post-change performance data, and an update unit to generate a second cost function by estimating errors in the output values of the first cost function, allowing for efficient parameter adjustment without requiring full recalibration of devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If calibration is performed in advance to associate machine coordinate system with camera coordinate system, then control accuracy is improved, but when environment changes (camera position or new camera), the system cannot control devices appropriately and requires time-consuming parameter verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to environmental changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static calibration parameters into dynamic adjustable parameters. The learning model continuously learns and adapts to environmental changes by processing demonstration data, allowing the system to maintain control accuracy without manual recalibration when camera position or equipment changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the learning model based on demonstrated operations rather than fixed calibration parameters. By learning from demonstration data, the system automatically adjusts parameters to adapt to environmental changes, eliminating the need for time-consuming parameter verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If parameters of sensors and control models are modified in response to environmental changes, then adaptability is improved, but since sensor characteristics are often unknown, device parameter verification is required which leads to time-consuming adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to environmental changesVSAvoidparameter adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The learning model performs self-adjustment by automatically learning from demonstration data. When environmental changes occur, the system autonomously updates its parameters through continuous learning without requiring manual verification or adjustment of sensor characteristics, significantly reducing parameter adjustment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from demonstrated operations to continuously improve its control parameters. By processing demonstration data and comparing actual performance with expected outcomes, the learning model automatically adjusts parameters to maintain optimal performance without time-consuming manual verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If device characteristics are verified by itself when making changes, then measurement precision is maintained, but the adjustment process requires a lot of time due to trade-off considerations among various factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice measurement precisionVSAvoidadjustment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning by continuously processing demonstration data in advance. This preliminary action builds a robust learning model that can quickly adapt to changes without requiring time-consuming verification, as the model has already learned from extensive demonstration data covering various operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12547128B2Adjustment system, adjustment method, and adjustment program
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 NEC CORP
  • US12547128B2 patent drawing
  • US12547128B2 patent drawing
  • US12547128B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An input unit 81 receives inputs of pre-change performance data acquired by a device before a change and post-change performance data acquired by the device after having undergone the change, through control using a first cost function. An update unit 82 generates a second cost function obtained by updating the first cost function in such a way as to reduce a difference between the pre-change performance data and the post-change performance data. In the process, the update unit 82 generates the second cost function obtained by updating the first cost function by estimating an error that occurs in an output value of the device included in the first cost function before and after the change to the device.