Counter-current Catalyst Flow in Two-stage Naphtha Reforming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing aromatic compounds like benzene, toluene, and xylenes from naphtha feedstreams are limited in efficiency and increase costs due to the formation of unwanted byproducts and the need for multiple reformers and catalysts, which restricts the production of higher value aromatics.

Innovation Solution

The process involves a two-stage reforming system with specific catalysts and temperature control to maximize aromatic yields, using a fractionation unit to separate hydrocarbon streams and passing them through reformer reactors to minimize temperature drop and reduce byproduct formation, with a catalyst regeneration system to maintain catalyst effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional single-stage reforming processes are used, then the process is simple, but the aromatic yield is limited and byproduct formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatic yieldVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reforming process is divided into two distinct stages: first reforming reactor system and second reforming reactor system. The first system operates under conditions optimized for naphthene dehydrogenation to aromatics, while the second system operates under conditions optimized for paraffin dehydrocyclization to aromatics. This segmentation allows each reactor to be optimized for specific reaction pathways, maximizing overall aromatic yield while minimizing unwanted byproducts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different operating conditions are applied to different reactor systems based on the specific conversion requirements. The first reforming reactor system uses catalysts and conditions optimized for naphthene conversion, while the second reforming reactor system uses catalysts and conditions optimized for paraffin conversion. This local optimization of process conditions enhances aromatic production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If multiple reformers with different catalysts are used, then aromatic production increases, but costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatic productionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst system is designed with multi-functionality, where a single catalyst composition (bimetallic noble metal on chlorinated alumina support) can operate effectively in both reforming stages. The catalyst maintains activity and selectivity across different operating conditions, reducing the need for multiple specialized catalysts and associated regeneration systems, thereby lowering overall manufacturing costs while maintaining high aromatic production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If temperature drop is not minimized in the reaction system, then reaction rate decreases, but energy efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The process incorporates preliminary heating of the hydrocarbon feedstock before it enters the reforming reactors. Heat exchangers preheat the feed using the hot effluent streams from the reactors, recovering energy that would otherwise be lost. This preliminary action maintains higher reaction rates while minimizing energy loss, as the temperature drop in the reaction system is compensated by the preheated feed and heat recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the production of benzene, toluene, and xylenes while reducing unwanted byproducts, enhancing the economic viability of the process by optimizing catalyst usage and process flow.

Implementation Method 1

The first reformer reactor system uses a catalyst that is appropriate for converting naphthenic compounds to aromatics, as well as dehydrogenating and cyclization of the paraffinic compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

passing a hydrocarbon feedstock to a fractionation unit to create a first overhead stream and a first bottoms stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFractionation: Fractionation

Implementation Method 3

The second reforming reactor system is operated to minimize the temperature drop in the reaction system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS8882994B2Counter-current catalyst flow with split feed and two reactor train processing
Publication Date: 2014.11.11 UOP LLC
  • US8882994B2 patent drawing
  • US8882994B2 patent drawing
  • US8882994B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process is presented for the increasing the yields of aromatics from reforming a hydrocarbon feedstream. The process includes splitting a naphtha feedstream into a light hydrocarbon stream, and a heavier stream having a relatively rich concentration of naphthenes. The heavy stream is reformed to convert the naphthenes to aromatics and the resulting product stream is further reformed with the light hydrocarbon stream to increase the aromatics yields. The process includes passing a catalyst stream in a counter-current flow relative to the hydrocarbon process stream.