Counter-Flow Heat Exchanger Core for Low Pressure Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heat exchangers in aircraft engine and environmental control systems face limitations in heat transfer performance, pressure loss, and size/weight reduction, necessitating improved designs.

Innovation Solution

A counter-flow heat exchanger with a core featuring concentric inner and outer walls, corrugated channels that diverge and converge, and additional cylindrical walls to enhance flow distribution and heat transfer, manufactured using additive methods like direct metal laser sintering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional plate/fin construction is used in heat exchangers, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but heat transfer performance is limited and size/weight cannot be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidheat transfer performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger core is segmented into multiple flow paths with inner and outer walls creating distinct channels. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each flow path while maintaining overall structural integrity, enabling improved heat transfer performance without sacrificing manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from conventional two-dimensional plate/fin construction to a three-dimensional cylindrical core structure with radial and axial flow paths. This dimensional change enables more efficient heat transfer surfaces and better fluid distribution while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through advanced fabrication methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Weight of stationary object

If heat exchanger size and weight are reduced, then system integration is improved, but heat transfer performance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidheat transfer performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger employs a nested cylindrical structure where inner walls with flow paths are positioned within outer walls, creating concentric channels. This nested arrangement maximizes heat transfer surface area within a compact volume, achieving high performance in a reduced size and weight package

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality optimization by creating regions of varying wall thickness, channel spacing, and flow path configurations within different sections of the heat exchanger core. This allows concentrated heat transfer enhancement in critical areas while minimizing overall material usage, reducing weight without sacrificing performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If flow paths are optimized for heat transfer, then heat transfer performance improves, but pressure loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer performanceVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger incorporates variable cross-sectional areas along the flow paths, with channel spacing and dimensions changing axially and radially. This dynamic geometry optimizes flow velocity and pressure distribution, maintaining high heat transfer coefficients while minimizing pressure losses through carefully designed transitions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes in the flow path geometry, including varying channel width, height, and curvature along the flow direction. These parameter variations are optimized to balance heat transfer enhancement with pressure loss reduction, achieving both goals simultaneously through computational design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If complex internal structures are added to enhance heat transfer, then heat transfer efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cylindrical core structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural support, defines flow paths, enables heat transfer, and facilitates fluid distribution. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, maintaining relative simplicity while achieving high heat transfer efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of multiple walls and partitions into a single integrated cylindrical core structure. The inner and outer walls are combined with internal partitions to create a unified component that performs heat transfer, flow distribution, and structural support, reducing assembly complexity while enhancing performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves increased heat transfer efficiency, reduced size, and weight, while minimizing pressure loss and maintaining thermal consistency across the heat exchanger, enabling high-temperature and high-pressure operation.

Implementation Method 1

heat exchanger core including an inner wall and an outer wall radially outward and spaced apart from the inner wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

A first flow path is defined within the inner wall and a second flow path is defined between the inner wall and the outer wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

The inner wall defines a first set of channels extending axially from the primary flow inlet to the middle portion of the heat exchanger core diverging away from a radial center of the heat exchanger core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 4

manufactured using additive methods like direct metal laser sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser sintering: Selective Laser Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS11692780B2Heat exchangers
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US11692780B2 patent drawing
  • US11692780B2 patent drawing
  • US11692780B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A counter-flow heat exchanger comprising a heat exchanger core including an inner wall and an outer wall radially outward and spaced apart from the inner wall. A first flow path is defined within the inner wall and a second flow path is defined between the inner wall and the outer wall. The heat exchanger core includes a primary flow inlet, a primary flow outlet and a middle portion therebetween. The inner and outer walls are concentric at the primary flow inlet of the heat exchanger core. The inner wall defines a first set of channels extending axially from the primary flow inlet to the middle portion of the heat exchanger core diverging away from a radial center of the heat exchanger core. The inner wall and the outer wall define a second set of channels extending axially from the primary flow inlet to the middle portion of the heat exchanger core converging toward the radial center of the heat exchanger core.