Counter-Gravity Casting with Liquid Quenching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Casting against gravity methods face limitations in solidification rate due to air cooling, which can result in inconsistent microstructure and increased oxide content in cast components.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of a pre-heated ceramic mold with a gas-permeable, impermeable-to-metal design, where a pressure differential is created to cast molten metal against gravity, followed by quenching in a controlled liquid medium to regulate the solidification rate and microstructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If air cooling is used for solidification in counter-gravity casting, then the casting process is simple, but the solidification rate is limited and microstructure is inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrostructure consistencyVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the cooling parameter from air cooling to liquid quenching, which fundamentally alters the heat transfer coefficient and solidification rate. This parameter change enables controlled rapid solidification while achieving consistent microstructure throughout the casting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a liquid quenching medium as an intermediary between the mold and the casting to achieve controlled rapid cooling. This intermediary enables precise control over the solidification process and microstructure development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If air cooling is used for solidification, then the equipment is simple, but oxide content increases in cast components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxide content controlVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a vacuum environment as an inert atmosphere during the quenching process, which prevents oxidation of the molten metal. This inert environment eliminates oxide formation while enabling rapid controlled solidification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the phase transition from liquid to solid during rapid quenching in a controlled vacuum environment. This phase transition occurs so rapidly that oxide formation is prevented, while achieving desired microstructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

3Productivity

If rapid solidification is achieved through liquid quenching, then solidification rate increases, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolidification rateVSAvoidquenching system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the quenching operation with the existing counter-gravity casting process by integrating liquid quenching into the vacuum chamber. This combination achieves rapid solidification without requiring separate complex quenching equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The molten metal itself serves as the quenching medium by utilizing its own thermal energy and the vacuum environment to achieve controlled rapid solidification. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external complex quenching systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables faster and more controlled solidification, reducing oxide content and achieving consistent microstructure in cast components, compared to traditional gravity-filled processes.

Implementation Method 1

The pressure within the mold is lowered relative to that around the metallic melt which causes the metallic melt to move against gravity and into the mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

quenching the molten metallic composition in a liquid quench medium to solidify the molten metallic composition within the mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat extraction: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentEP2969306B1Methods for casting against gravity
Publication Date: 2019.09.11 PCC STRUCTURALS
  • EP2969306B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2969306B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2969306B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods of manufacturing castings are described. The method can include heating a ceramic mold comprising a gate inlet, and melting a metallic composition. The method can also include presenting the ceramic mold to a casting station such that the gate inlet is in fluid communication with the molten metallic composition, and casting against gravity the molten metallic composition into the heated mold through the gate inlet. Furthermore, the method can include rotating the mold to position with the gate inlet in an upward direction while the metallic composition is at least partially molten within the mold, and quenching the molten metallic composition in a liquid quench medium to solidify the molten metallic composition within the mold.