Integral Counter-Knife Insert for Sickle Guard

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sickle guard counter-knife inserts in agricultural harvesting machines are prone to dislodgment and fragility, requiring significant assembly time and being costly to replace, as they are secured with dedicated screws and often made of metal.

Innovation Solution

The design of a pair of counter-knives connected by a crossbar, forming an integral unit, which can be secured using existing bolts, reducing dislodgment and fabricated from sheet metal for cost-effectiveness, with sharpened edges for cutting action, and integrated with a polymeric sickle guard for weight reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If counter-knife inserts are secured with dedicated screw fixings, then the inserts are firmly attached to guard fingers, but the assembly time increases significantly and the inserts may still work loose over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the counter-knife insert with the guard finger by forming them as a single integral component. This eliminates the need for separate screw fixings, reducing assembly time while maintaining attachment reliability through the unified structure that prevents loosening over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The guard finger is designed to serve multiple functions: it provides structural support, houses the counter-knife, and integrates the securing mechanism all in one component. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated screw fixings while ensuring reliable attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If counter-knife inserts are made from metal, then durability and cutting edge strength are improved, but the cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting edge strengthVSAvoidinsert weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite construction where the guard finger is made from polymeric material and the counter-knife insert is made from metallic material. This composite approach allows the lightweight polymer to provide structural support while the metal insert provides the necessary cutting edge strength, optimizing both weight and strength characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If dedicated screw fixings are used to secure inserts, then the inserts are firmly attached, but the complexity of assembly and potential for dislodgment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By combining the guard finger and counter-knife insert into a single integral component, the patent eliminates the complex screw fixing system. The unified structure inherently prevents dislodgment while simplifying assembly to a single operation, reducing both complexity and potential reliability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11310958B2Sickle guard counter-knife insert
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 AGCO DO BRASIL SOLUCOES AGRI LTDA
  • US11310958B2 patent drawing
  • US11310958B2 patent drawing
  • US11310958B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sickle guard counter-knife insert includes a pair of counter-knives. Each counter-knife defines a channel for an operable sickle bar between mutually-coupled upper and lower portions. The counter-knives and a connecting crossbar are formed together as an integral unit.