Counter Lock Sequential Release Mechanism for Double Leaf Doors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing counter locks for double leaf doors require excessive force to open due to sequential release of blocking points, which does not align with safety regulations during emergency situations.

Innovation Solution

A counter lock design featuring an actuating cam coupled to a follower, upper and lower sliders, and a pusher that sequentially releases upper and lower blocking points, allowing for easier door opening while maintaining safety standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the counter lock uses a conventional mechanism with multiple blocking points, then the door security is improved, but the force required to open the door increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor securityVSAvoidforce required to open door
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking mechanism is segmented into multiple independent blocking points (upper, lower, and central) that can be released sequentially. The actuating cam is divided into distinct actuating surfaces that engage different sliders at different rotation angles, allowing the blocking points to be released in a controlled sequence rather than all at once, reducing the peak force required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuating cam is designed to release the central blocking point first through preliminary rotation, before engaging the upper and lower blocking points. This preliminary action of releasing the central latch first creates a mechanical advantage that reduces the force needed for subsequent blocking point releases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the counter lock releases all blocking points simultaneously, then the ease of operation is improved, but the safety compliance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of door openingVSAvoidsafety regulation compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking points are released in a periodic sequence rather than simultaneously. The actuating cam rotates through distinct phases, with each phase releasing a specific blocking point in a predetermined sequence (central first, then upper and lower). This periodic release pattern maintains safety compliance while keeping the operation smooth and controlled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If the counter lock uses a sequential release mechanism, then the safety compliance is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety regulation complianceVSAvoidcounter lock mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating cam serves multiple functions: it sequentially actuates the pusher for the central blocking point, the upper slider, and the lower slider through different surfaces on the same component. This multi-functionality achieves sequential release without requiring separate actuating mechanisms for each blocking point, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple actuating functions are merged into a single actuating cam component. The cam combines the functions of releasing the central latch, upper blocking point, and lower blocking point in one integrated mechanism, reducing the overall complexity compared to using separate actuators for each blocking point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The counter lock reduces the force required to open the door by releasing the central blocking point first, followed by the upper and lower points, ensuring compliance with safety regulations and ease of operation.

Implementation Method 1

an actuating cam (30) coupled to the follower (10), both the actuating cam and the follower being configured for rotating in an opening direction about a common axis of rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Implementation Method 2

a pusher (50) configured for actuating a latch (8) of a lock (4), with the latch being housed at least partially in the counter lock (5) when the counter lock (5) is in the neutral position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force transmission: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

an upper slider (12) configured for being coupled to an upper rod (18) through which the blocking of the inactive leaf at an upper blocking point is maintained

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSlider mechanism:

Data Source

PatentEP3702558B1Counter lock for an inactive leaf of a double leaf door
Publication Date: 2022.01.12 TALLERES DE ESCORIAZA SA
  • EP3702558B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3702558B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3702558B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Counter lock for an inactive leaf comprising a cam (30) coupled to a follower (10), sliders (12, 15) configured for being coupled to rods through which the blocking of the inactive leaf at blocking points is maintained in a neutral position, the cam (30) being configured for moving at least one of the sliders (12, 15) when the follower (10) is rotated in an opening direction releasing the blocking points, and a pusher (50) configured for actuating a latch which, in the neutral position, is housed in the counter lock (5) blocking an active leaf at a central blocking point. The cam (30) is configured for actuating the pusher (50) when the follower (10) is rotated in the opening direction causing the release of the central point, and to then move one of the sliders (12, 15) unblocking the rest of the blocking points.