Counter Reset Interface for Image Processing Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern image processing devices face inaccuracies in monitoring and maintenance scheduling due to the failure to reset counters associated with replaced components, leading to incorrect usage tracking.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that allow a computing system to identify replacement components in an image processing device, determine if counters have been reset, and provide a graphical user interface for users to reset counters through a resource sent to the device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a component is replaced in an image processing device, then the device can continue operating with improved performance, but the counter associated with the component may not be reset leading to inaccurate monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring accuracyVSAvoidcounter resetting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects when a component has been replaced by monitoring component identification information and autonomously determines whether the associated counter needs resetting, eliminating the need for manual intervention and ensuring accurate monitoring without additional operational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the computing system receives component information from the image processing device, compares it with stored information to detect replacements, and then provides appropriate feedback through graphical user interface notifications to guide counter resetting actions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the system automatically detects replacement components and provides reset interfaces, then counter accuracy is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounter value accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing system acts as an intermediary between the image processing device and the user, handling the complex tasks of component detection, comparison, and reset interface provision through a web-based architecture that communicates via HTTP protocols, thereby isolating the complexity from both the device and the end user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The computing system performs multiple functions including receiving component information, storing it in databases, comparing current and historical data to detect replacements, determining counter reset needs, and providing graphical user interface resources, all within a single multi-functional platform that reduces overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If manual counter resetting is required after component replacement, then system complexity is reduced, but monitoring reliability deteriorates due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidmonitoring accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs the monitoring and detection functions that would otherwise require manual user action, by autonomously comparing component identification information and determining when counters need resetting, thereby ensuring reliability without requiring complex manual procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a continuous feedback loop where component replacement information is automatically captured, processed, and communicated back to users through the graphical user interface, ensuring that monitoring accuracy is maintained through automated detection rather than relying on manual user awareness and action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9888145B2System and method enabling resetting of a counter associated with a component of an image processing device
Publication Date: 2018.02.06 CANON INFORMATION & IMAGING SOLUTIONS
  • US9888145B2 patent drawing
  • US9888145B2 patent drawing
  • US9888145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media are provided. Some embodiments include receiving, at a computing system from an image processing device, a request to access a resource. The computing system obtains information that identifies a component installed on the image processing device as a replacement component. The computing system obtains information indicating a count value of a counter associated with the component. The computing system determines whether the counter has been reset based on the information indicating the count value of the counter. In response to determining that the counter has not been reset, the computing system sends, to the image processing device, the resource including information for presentation as an interface element in a graphical user interface on a display of the image processing device, the interface element enabling a user to reset the counter by selecting the interface element.