Counter-Rotating Disc Floor Edger Torque Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing floor edge grinders pose challenges due to torque on operators, making them fatigued and difficult to control, and risk gouging walls or side moldings during aggressive treatments like abrading and sanding.

Innovation Solution

A floor edger and grinder device with a pivotable deck connection, dual grinder discs rotating in opposite directions, and a protective skirt to prevent wall damage, along with a vacuum port for dust control, and adjustable handle for operator comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single grinder disc is used for aggressive treatments like abrading and sanding, then the treatment effectiveness is improved, but torque on the operator increases causing fatigue and difficulty in control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidoperator fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The single grinder disc is segmented into two counter-rotating grinder discs that rotate in opposite directions. This segmentation balances the torque generated during aggressive treatments like abrading and sanding, reducing operator fatigue while maintaining treatment effectiveness. Each disc handles half the workload, creating counterbalancing forces that eliminate the net torque on the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two grinder discs are configured to rotate in opposite directions, creating counterbalancing forces that act as mechanical counterweights. The torque generated by one disc is offset by the equal and opposite torque from the other disc, effectively canceling out the net torque on the operator and reducing fatigue during aggressive floor treatments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single exposed grinder disc protrudes from the housing, then access to edge areas is improved, but the risk of gouging walls or side moldings increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge access capabilityVSAvoidwall gouging risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The single exposed disc is segmented into two counter-rotating discs positioned side-by-side, both protruding from the housing. This segmentation allows the machine to access edge areas effectively while distributing the grinding action across two discs, reducing the likelihood of any single disc gouging walls or moldings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The counter-rotating configuration creates preliminary anti-action by generating opposing forces that stabilize the disc assembly. This prevents the discs from wandering or digging into walls and moldings, as the counterbalancing forces actively counteract any tendency toward gouging before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the deck is fixed to the frame, then structural stability is improved, but the ability to adjust for different operating conditions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck structural stabilityVSAvoiddeck angle adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The deck connection transitions from a fixed static joint to a dynamic pivotable connection with multiple locking positions. The deck can be rotated relative to the frame and locked at different angles, providing adaptability for various operating conditions while maintaining structural stability when locked in position. This dynamic adjustment capability allows optimization of the deck angle for different floor treatments and operator preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces operator fatigue, prevents wall damage, and enhances control during aggressive treatments by distributing torque and providing a protective barrier, while maintaining a compact and durable design.

Implementation Method 1

the rotation of the single disc produces a torque on the entire machine which produces fatigue in the operator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Implementation Method 2

More aggressive treatments of floors such as abrading and sanding exert signified torque which can quickly fatigue an operator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Implementation Method 3

the exposed edge of the disc may engage and gouge the wall or side molding if the operator does not adequately control the machine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 4

a vacuum port for dust control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS8172649B2Floor edger and grinder device
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 ONFLOOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US8172649B2 patent drawing
  • US8172649B2 patent drawing
  • US8172649B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A floor edger and grinding device 10 has a deck 20 pivotably mounted to a rear frame 18 with a handle 16. The deck has a motor 22 mounted thereon that drives two grinder discs 24 in opposite rotational directions. The deck has a skirt 26 and a notch 28 extending along the front edge 27 of the skirt. The discs 24 protrude into the notch 28. A case 50 surrounds the drive gears 38 for protection against dust created by the discs 24.