Counter-Rotating Propeller Layout for UAV Yaw Torque Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aerial vehicles face significant yaw torque instability and stress when a single vertical propulsion unit fails, impacting flight dynamics and requiring a control system that can efficiently manage thrust distribution and counteract torque imbalances.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a control system with counter-rotating vertical propulsion units in quadrants and a saturation scheme that transfers torque from outer to inner propulsion rings, using an allocation matrix and force command input vector to adjust thrust commands and compensate for failures in real-time, reducing overall yaw torque and stress on the airframe.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional single-rotation vertical propulsion units are used, then the aerial vehicle can achieve vertical propulsion, but significant yaw torque instability and stress occur when a propulsion unit fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight stabilityVSAvoidyaw torque instability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by implementing counter-rotation of propellers in opposite quadrants. Specifically, propellers in the first and third quadrants rotate in one direction while propellers in the second and fourth quadrants rotate in the opposite direction. This asymmetric rotation configuration creates balanced torque that cancels out yaw torque instability, especially when a single propulsion unit fails, thereby improving flight stability without requiring excessive structural reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements counterweight by using counter-rotating propellers to generate opposing torques that balance each other. When one propulsion unit fails, the counter-rotating propellers in opposite quadrants create compensating torques that offset the imbalance, effectively acting as a counterweight system to maintain rotational equilibrium and reduce yaw torque instability on the airframe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If counter-rotating vertical propulsion units are implemented, then yaw torque and stress on airframe are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyaw torqueVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a control system that simultaneously performs multiple functions: it manages normal thrust distribution across all propulsion units, monitors for failure conditions, automatically detects which propeller has failed, and dynamically adjusts thrust allocation to compensate for failures. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a unified control architecture, reducing overall system complexity despite the counter-rotation configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements self-service by automatically detecting propeller failures and reconfiguring thrust distribution without external intervention. The system continuously monitors propulsion unit performance, identifies failures through sensor data analysis, and autonomously adjusts the thrust commands to maintain stable flight, thereby serving itself and reducing the need for complex manual control systems or additional mechanical redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If thrust commands are adjusted in real-time to compensate for failures, then flight dynamics stability is maintained, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight dynamicsVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring the control system with the counter-rotating propeller arrangement and pre-programming the thrust allocation algorithms that will automatically activate upon failure detection. The control architecture is designed in advance to handle failure scenarios, with predetermined response protocols that allow the system to quickly reconfigure thrust distribution without requiring complex real-time decision-making, thereby maintaining flight dynamics stability through pre-planned control strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11091260B2Counter-rotating propellers for aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 WING AVIATION LLC
  • US11091260B2 patent drawing
  • US11091260B2 patent drawing
  • US11091260B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerial vehicle includes an airframe; vertical propulsion units, and a controller. The vertical propulsion units are mounted to the airframe and include propellers oriented to provide vertical propulsion to the aerial vehicle. The vertical propulsion units are physically organized in quadrants on the airframe with each of the quadrants including two or more of the vertical propulsion units. The controller is coupled to the vertical propulsion units to control operation of the vertical propulsion units. At least two of the vertical propulsion units in each of the quadrants are adapted to counter-rotate from each other during flight of the aerial vehicle.