Counter-Flow Evaporative Heat Exchanger With Periodic Core Wetting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing indirect evaporative coolers face challenges in size and shape compatibility for domestic use, with issues related to space constraints, water distribution, and thermal performance, particularly in maintaining cooling efficiency and flushing salts from the heat exchanger core.

Innovation Solution

A counter flow indirect evaporative heat exchanger design featuring alternately stacked horizontal wet and dry passages constructed from corrugated sheets with a wettable and impermeable surface, utilizing a traversing water distribution mechanism to periodically wet the core efficiently, allowing for compact dimensions and effective cooling while minimizing water flow impact on cooling efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the heat exchanger height is increased to increase cooling capacity, then the cooling performance is improved, but the device depth from the wall increases beyond acceptable limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoiddevice depth
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reorients the heat exchanger passages from vertical stacking to horizontal stacking arrangement. The wet and dry passages are stacked alternately in a horizontal configuration, allowing the cooling capacity to be increased by extending the device horizontally rather than vertically, thus maintaining a compact depth from the wall while achieving high cooling performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If water flow through the wet passages is increased to flush salts, then salt removal is improved, but the cooling efficiency deteriorates due to excessive water flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesalt accumulationVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a periodic wetting cycle where water is introduced to the wet passages at intervals to flush out accumulated salts, followed by periods where water flow is stopped or minimized to allow evaporation and restore cooling efficiency. This cyclic operation between wetting and drying phases enables salt removal while maintaining high cooling performance during the drying periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates a water distribution mechanism that pre-wets the wet passages before the flushing cycle begins, ensuring that salt deposits are adequately saturated and loosened for effective removal during the subsequent flushing phase, thereby maximizing salt removal efficiency while minimizing the duration of reduced cooling performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the heat exchanger core is made taller to increase capacity, then the cooling capacity is improved, but the water distribution and flushing capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidwater distribution effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from vertical to horizontal stacking of heat exchanger passages, enabling the core to be extended in the horizontal dimension to increase capacity while maintaining effective water distribution. The horizontal configuration allows water to be distributed more uniformly across the wet passages through gravity and capillary action, improving water distribution effectiveness alongside increased cooling capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If the heat exchanger width is increased to increase capacity, then the cooling capacity is improved, but the device width exceeds handling and installation limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoiddevice footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes horizontal stacking of passages arranged in alternating wet and dry configurations, allowing the cooling capacity to be increased by extending the device in a controlled horizontal direction while maintaining a compact width suitable for handling and installation. The alternating passage arrangement optimizes the use of available space, achieving high capacity within manageable dimensional constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables a compact, efficient, and practical indirect evaporative cooler that meets size and shape requirements, maintaining high cooling performance and allowing for periodic flushing of salts without compromising thermal efficiency, even in taller configurations.

Implementation Method 1

corrugated sheets with one side comprising a wettable and absorbent medium and the other side comprising a water impermeable surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

Heat transferring from the wet passage side to the dry passage side has to travel through relatively long distances of heat exchanger material, necessitating the use of high conductivity materials such as metals to achieve reasonable performance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

evaporation still takes place from water held in the wetted surfaces and full thermal performance of the cooler is achieved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentEP2362933B8Counter flow indirect evaporative heat exchanger
Publication Date: 2016.02.24 F F SEELEY NOMINEES PTY LTD

AI summary

A counter flow indirect evaporative heat exchanger (10) having vertically stacked alternate counter flow wet (14) and dry (12) passages where the wet passages are wetted during operation of the heat exchanger by wetting means (50, 52, 53, 54, 70, 72, 74, 76) travelling vertically of the stack. Elongately wetting of a small plurality of the total number of passages (14, 12) of the heat exchanger (10) occurs at a time during vertical travel of the wetting means.