Counterforce Safety System for Rotational Impact Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety systems, such as helmets and protective gear, are primarily passive and unable to effectively mitigate the high acceleration forces and rotational impacts that can cause injuries during collisions, as they only absorb or redirect impact energy without actively counteracting the forces.

Innovation Solution

A counterforce safety system that utilizes stored energy to accelerate a projectile mass, guided by sensors and kinetic energy converters, to generate directed forces that counteract impact forces, reducing acceleration and rotation-induced injuries by actively reorienting the head or body during impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive safety systems (helmets, protective gear) are used to absorb impact forces, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the system cannot effectively mitigate high acceleration forces and rotational impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static, passive safety system into a dynamic, active system by incorporating sensors that detect impact conditions and triggers that activate counterforce mechanisms in real-time. The system transitions from merely absorbing impact forces to actively generating counterforces that oppose the direction of impact, thereby significantly improving protection effectiveness against high acceleration forces and rotational impacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional passive mechanical absorption mechanisms with an active system that uses sensors, electronic triggers, and controlled force generation. This substitution introduces electronic and sensor-based components that detect impact conditions and activate counterforces, enhancing the system's ability to mitigate complex impact forces while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If stored energy is used to separate attached mass from helmet during deceleration, then the inertial effect is reduced, but the energy is only sufficient for separation and cannot provide additional protective forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact mitigationVSAvoidenergy utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates stored energy mechanisms that are pre-charged and ready for activation before impact occurs. When sensors detect impact conditions, the stored energy is rapidly deployed to generate counterforces that not only separate attached mass but also actively oppose impact forces. This preliminary preparation ensures that energy is available at the critical moment, improving impact mitigation while optimizing energy utilization through targeted deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the functional parameters of stored energy from merely providing separation force to generating multi-directional counterforces that adapt to impact conditions. By adjusting the deployment parameters of stored energy based on sensor input, the system can optimize force magnitude and direction to address both mass separation and impact mitigation simultaneously, thereby improving reliability while enhancing energy utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If force is applied in line with barrel to neutralize recoil, then the recoil energy is effectively counteracted, but forces cannot be applied in other directions to address multi-directional impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce application effectivenessVSAvoidforce direction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional force generation system that can apply counterforces in multiple directions to address various types of impacts. The system incorporates sensors that detect impact direction and magnitude, then activates appropriate counterforce mechanisms that can operate in different orientations. This universal capability allows the system to effectively counteract not only linear recoil forces but also rotational impacts and multi-directional forces, thereby improving reliability while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends force application from a single linear dimension to multiple dimensions by incorporating mechanisms that can generate forces in various directions. The system uses sensor data to determine impact vectors and activates counterforce mechanisms that operate in corresponding dimensions, enabling effective counteraction of complex multi-directional impacts including rotational forces. This dimensional expansion significantly improves both force application effectiveness and directional adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces impact-generated g-forces and rotational accelerations, providing enhanced protection against concussions and other injuries by deploying stored energy to create counterforces that limit damage during collisions, with the potential to reduce helmet accelerations to safer levels and prevent ankle sprains and other limb injuries.

Implementation Method 1

a kinetic energy converter to be powered by the stored energy holder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy conversion:

Implementation Method 2

at least one sensor in proximity to the counterforce safety system to selectively trigger the acceleration of the projectile mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact detection:

Implementation Method 3

a projectile mass to be accelerated by the kinetic energy converter... to generate directed forces that counteract impact forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNewton's third law:

Data Source

PatentUS9273827B1Counterforce safety system
Publication Date: 2016.03.01 EIDON LLC
  • US9273827B1 patent drawing
  • US9273827B1 patent drawing
  • US9273827B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A kinetic response system comprising an impact member to receive an impact force thereto, one or more annular guides positioned proximate the impact member, one or more projectile masses to respectively travel along the one or more annular guides, a kinetic energy converter to accelerate the one or more projectile masses along the one or more annular guides, and a controller to selectively trigger the kinetic energy converter to accelerate the one or more projectile masses along the one or more annular guides. The one or more projectile masses being accelerated in response to the impact force contributing to acceleration of the impact member above a defined threshold. The accelerated projectile masses create a rotational force to cause a kinetic push against the impact member in opposition to the impact force.