Countermeasure Effector Field Display for Coordinated UAV Neutralization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing counter measure systems for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) lack effective coordination and centralized control, leading to inefficient management and limited information flow during multiple UAV engagements, particularly in large secured areas.

Innovation Solution

A centralized controller that integrates with multiple counter measure effectors, utilizing sensors for UAV position and type determination, and provides a display interface for operator guidance, enabling coordinated actions and strategic decision-making through command signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple counter measure effectors are deployed in large secured areas, then the coverage area is improved, but the coordination complexity and information flow management deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecured area coverageVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the secured area into multiple zones, each monitored and controlled by a dedicated counter measure effector. The centralized controller receives information from sensors in each zone and coordinates effector actions independently, managing complexity through spatial segmentation of the security perimeter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized controller acts as an intermediary between multiple counter measure effectors and command structures. This intermediary aggregates information from various sensors and coordinates effector actions, simplifying the information flow management and reducing direct coordination complexity between individual effectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If operators make decisions single-handedly, then the decision-making speed is improved, but the operational effectiveness and information sharing deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making speedVSAvoidoperational effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the decision-making capabilities of individual operators with centralized command control. The centralized controller aggregates information from multiple sensors and coordinates effector actions, combining the speed of individual decision-making with the effectiveness of coordinated operational commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor UAV positions and effector actions, feeding this information back to the centralized controller. This enables rapid decision-making based on real-time conditions while maintaining coordinated operational effectiveness through continuous information sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If limited information flows to operational command, then the information flow speed is improved, but the decision-making quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation flow speedVSAvoiddecision-making quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and filters only the most critical information from the complex operational environment and transmits it to operational command. The centralized controller processes sensor data, identifies key information about UAV positions and threats, and communicates this condensed information rapidly to command while maintaining decision-making quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of information at the centralized controller level before transmitting to operational command. Sensors continuously monitor and the controller pre-processes data to identify and prioritize critical information, enabling fast information flow while maintaining decision-making quality through advance data preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the ability to strategically control and coordinate counter measure effectors, improving operational efficiency and ensuring safe and targeted neutralization of UAVs while avoiding collateral damage.

Implementation Method 1

Such counter measure effectors typically include one or more counter measure effectors (also known as jammers) configured to emit electromagnetic radiation towards UAVs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation emission: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP4179653B1Controller for and method of controlling a counter measure system
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 STEELROCK TECH LTD
  • EP4179653B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4179653B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4179653B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a controller (10) for a counter measure system against unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), the controller (10) comprising a display device (18) and a processor configured to: receive target position data indicative of a position of a target UAV; receive effector position data indicative of a position of at least one counter measure effectors (12, 14); receive effector orientation data indicative of an orientation of the at least one counter measure effector (12, 14) relative to geographic cardinal directions; determine a field of effect (30, 32) of the at least one counter measure effector on the basis of the effector position data and the effector orientation data, said field (30, 32) of effect being indicative of an area covered by electromagnetic radiation emitted, in use, by the at least one counter measure effector; and, generate a display signal for displaying, on the display device, the position of the target UAV with respect to the field of effect (30, 32) of the at least one counter measure effector (12, 14).