Countersunk Screw With Integrated Punching And Milling Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing countersunk screws face challenges in manufacturing complexity and achieving a clean surface after screwing, as they often require intricate designs and sharp edges that complicate the screwing process and result in bulging around the screw head.

Innovation Solution

A countersunk screw design featuring a punching device that cuts wood fibers around the screw head edge, combined with milling ribs or pockets, to create a smooth surface by first milling away wood and then cutting off fiber ends, ensuring a clean and flush installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional countersunk screw design with sharp edges is used, then the screw can cut into the wood, but it causes wood fibers to bulge around the screw head

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescrewing processVSAvoidsurface smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The screw head is divided into multiple functional zones: a countersunk section for creating the recess, a punching device for cutting fibers, and a milling device for smoothing the surface. Each zone performs a specific function to achieve the overall goal of clean installation without bulging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The milling ribs and punching device perform preliminary actions on the wood fibers before the screw head is fully driven in. The milling ribs first roughen and separate the fibers, then the punching device cuts them cleanly, preventing bulging during the final tightening phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Shape

If a punching device is added to cut wood fibers, then surface smoothness is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidscrew head structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The punching device and milling device are merged into the screw head structure itself rather than being separate tools. The punching device is formed by the edge of the countersunk section, and the milling ribs are integrated onto the outer surface, eliminating the need for separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The screw head serves multiple functions: fastening the wood pieces together, creating a recess with the countersunk section, cutting fibers with the punching device, and smoothing the surface with the milling ribs. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate operations or components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If milling ribs are added to the screw head, then wood removal efficiency is improved, but the screw head design becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewood removal efficiencyVSAvoidscrew head structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The milling ribs are placed only in the specific region where wood removal is needed - on the outer surface of the countersunk section. This localized application of milling features provides the necessary wood removal efficiency without adding complexity to the entire screw head structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables quick and efficient screwing with a smooth surface finish, reducing manufacturing complexity and eliminating bulging issues by using a punching device and milling features to precisely form the indentation.

Implementation Method 1

the punching device now cuts the wood fibers around the edge of the screw head to form a hole which corresponds to the diameter of the screw head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical cutting: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

when screwing in the screw, the wood is first milled away at the point where the countersunk head is to be arranged, until towards the end of the screwing-in process the remaining fiber ends are cut off

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMilling: Abrasion

Implementation Method 3

the punching device is formed by a sharp-edged edge of a shoulder surface, the diameter of which is at least as large as the diameter of the base of the countersunk section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear cutting: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP1806508B1Countersunk head srew
Publication Date: 2009.12.02 SWG SCHRAUBENWERK GAISBACH GMBH & CO KG
  • EP1806508B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5

AI summary

The screw has a head formed as a countersunk head, a front screw end and a shaft (2) attached to the head. A screw thread partially extends over the shaft, and a punching unit is provided at the lower side of the head. The punching unit is arranged on the side of a countersunk section, which is averted to the front end. The punching unit has an axial distance from the base of the countersunk section. A cylindrical section (10) is formed between the punching unit and the base of the countersunk section.